首页> 外文学位 >A Multi-Method Examination of Homicide Investigations on Case Outcomes.
【24h】

A Multi-Method Examination of Homicide Investigations on Case Outcomes.

机译:关于案件结果的凶杀案调查的多方法检验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Approximately a third of homicide cases go unsolved each year. Research focused on understanding what affects homicide clearance rates is often methodologically underdeveloped and has produced mixed findings. These deficiencies compromise the ability of researchers to provide important guidance to police practitioners seeking to develop best practices. Under-specified modeling and limited access to accurate sources of homicide investigation data are two potential and interconnected reasons for the inconsistencies found in previous studies. The purpose of this study was to expand the literature on homicide case outcomes as follows: 1) to organize predictors into five substantive domains (involved subjects, event circumstances, case dynamics, ecological characteristics, and investigator factors) and operationalize multiple measures of each as viable predictors of clearance outcomes; 2) to explore the utility of using original and verified police data with a larger number of nuanced data points than previously documented in modeling efforts; and 3) to forward a unique multi-method account of the factors that predict homicide case outcomes that can be readily replicated in future studies. Data were collected from one Southern metropolitan police department's 2009 to 2011 homicide investigations (N = 252). Access to official homicide case files allowed for key subject, incident, and evidentiary information to be obtained. Critical investigation details and context were added to the case file data via interviews and survey administration efforts involving the lead detectives that worked the cases. The dataset was further supplemented with Census data. Subsequent analyses included examination of the data quality and multivariate logistic regressions. A comparison of the dataset after the first stage of data collection to the final product was conducted to understand the extent to which the dataset were improved. The multi-method process resulted in more precision to the data recorded from case files, significant reductions in missing data, and heightened detail on key variables. Consequently those data allowed for specification of a multivariate model that included multiple measures from all of the homicide investigation domains. Those results suggest the expanded data more accurately captured the factors that predict clearance outcomes as measures within all five domains were significant predictors of investigation closure.
机译:每年大约有三分之一的凶杀案未解决。专注于了解什么因素影响凶杀清除率的研究通常在方法上欠发达,并且产生了混杂的发现。这些缺陷损害了研究人员向寻求发展最佳实践的警务人员提供重要指导的能力。指定不足的模型和对凶杀案调查数据准确来源的有限访问是先前研究中发现不一致之处的两个潜在且相互联系的原因。这项研究的目的是扩大有关杀人案件结局的文献,内容如下:1)将预测因素组织为五个实质性领域(涉及的主题,事件情况,案例动态,生态特征和调查者因素),并对每个因素采取多种措施清除结果的可行预测指标; 2)探索使用原始和经过验证的警察数据以及比模型化工作中以前记录的细微数据点更多的实用程序; 3)针对预测凶杀案结局的因素提供独特的多方法解释,这些因素可以在以后的研究中轻易复制。数据是从南方都市警察局2009年至2011年的凶杀案调查中收集的(N = 252)。可访问官方的凶杀案档案,以获取关键的主题,事件和证据信息。关键的调查详细信息和上下文通过涉及工作案件的首席侦探的访谈和调查管理工作被添加到案件文件数据中。该数据集进一步补充了人口普查数据。随后的分析包括数据质量检查和多元逻辑回归。将数据收集的第一阶段之后的数据集与最终产品进行比较,以了解数据集的改进程度。多方法处理可以提高从案例文件记录的数据的准确性,显着减少丢失的数据,并提高关键变量的细节。因此,这些数据可用于指定一个多变量模型,其中包括来自所有凶杀案调查领域的多个度量。这些结果表明,扩展的数据更准确地捕获了预测清除结果的因素,因为所有五个域中的措施都是调查结束的重要预测因素。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hawk, Shila Rene.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgia State University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgia State University.;
  • 学科 Criminology.;Personality psychology.;Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 301 p.
  • 总页数 301
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号