首页> 外文学位 >Organizational cohesiveness and polarization of ethnic foreign policy lobbies in the United States: A comparative study of the pro-Israel lobby and the pro-Arab lobby, 1980s-2000s.
【24h】

Organizational cohesiveness and polarization of ethnic foreign policy lobbies in the United States: A comparative study of the pro-Israel lobby and the pro-Arab lobby, 1980s-2000s.

机译:美国种族外交政策游说组织的凝聚力和两极分化:1980年代至2000年代对支持以色列的游说者和支持阿拉伯的游说者的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Why ethnic foreign policy lobbies are organizationally cohesive or polarized is theoretically explicated in this study. My theory of intra-lobby cohesiveness (Th.ILC) suggests that the achievement of organizational cohesiveness (OC) is contingent upon high levels of the lobby's collective sense of belonging (CSB+) and aggregated self-confidence (ASC+). These levels correspond with the lobby's positive perception of the image of its ethnic community (LPC+). A satisfactory amount of the community's support of the lobby leads to a high level of LPC+. This community's support is mostly determined by the high socio-economic status of the community. The achievement of OC leads to: aggressive lobbying activities in the legislative sphere, a significant impact on the hostland's foreign policy, and a strong relationship between the lobby and the political regime of the original homeland. The findings suggest that the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC was cohesive during the examined years due to its correspondence with those principles. My theory of intra-lobby polarization (Th.ILP) postulates that organizational polarization (OP) is explained by the low to moderate levels of the lobby's collective sense of belonging (CSB-) and aggregated self-confidence (ASC-). CSB- and ASC-correspond with the lobby's negative perception of the image of its ethnic community (LPC-). An unsatisfactory amount of the community's support causes LPC-. The low community's support is mostly affected by the community's non-high socio-economic status. OP results in: limited lobbying activities, an insignificant impact on the hostland's foreign policy, and a weak relationship between the lobby and the political regime of the original homeland. The findings suggest that the pro-Arab lobby NAAA-ADC was organizationally polarized during the time period covered in this study because of its significant CSB- and ASC-.
机译:在这项研究中,理论上阐明了为什么民族外交政策游说组织具有凝聚力或两极化。我对大厅内凝聚力(Th.ILC)的理论表明,组织凝聚力(OC)的获得取决于游说者的集体归属感(CSB +)和总体自信(ASC +)的高水平。这些级别对应于大厅对其族群形象(LPC +)的积极认识。社区对游说团体的满意支持导致LPC +的高水平。该社区的支持主要取决于社区的较高社会经济地位。 OC的成就导致:在立法领域内进行了积极的游说活动,对祖国的外交政策产生了重大影响,并且游说与原始祖国的政治政权之间建立了牢固的关系。调查结果表明,亲以色列的游说者AIPAC在所研究的年份中具有凝聚力,因为它与那些原则相符。我的大厅内极化理论(Th.ILP)假设组织的极化(OP)是由游说者的集体归属感(CSB-)和综合自信(ASC-)的低至中等水平来解释的。 CSB和ASC对应于大厅对其种族社区(LPC-)形象的负面看法。 LPC-引起了社区支持的不足。低社区的支持主要受社区的非高社会经济地位影响。 OP导致:游说活动有限,对东道国的外交政策影响不大,游说与原籍国的政治政权之间的关系薄弱。研究结果表明,亲阿拉伯游说NAAA-ADC在本研究涵盖的时间段内在组织上处于两极分化状态,因为其CSB-和ASC-重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ali, Muna Ali.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Jewish Studies.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 371 p.
  • 总页数 371
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号