首页> 外文学位 >Exploring Factors Influencing Critical Thinking Skills in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Mixed Methods Study.
【24h】

Exploring Factors Influencing Critical Thinking Skills in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Mixed Methods Study.

机译:探索影响本科护理学生批判性思维能力的因素:混合方法研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Health science education has been moving towards a model of Interprofessional Education in order to meet the increasing demands of Interprofessional Practice in Healthcare, which focuses on delivering high quality patient centered care. This model of Healthcare will lead to improved patient outcomes and overall efficiency of healthcare. Another integral component between effective health care practice and the education of health professional students is the development of critical thinking skills. In order for healthcare professionals to communicate effectively with their patients and their families and also with one another, as in interprofessional practice, critical thinking skills are required. Therefore, critical thinking would be necessary for interprofessional education and subsequently interprofessional practice. Critical thinking in the different health professions needs to be addressed in order for interprofessional education and practice to be effective.;Critical thinking is a multi- faceted concept and is influenced by a variety of factors. However, throughout the literature on critical thinking, the influence of these factors is not consistent. The primary purpose of this study is to identify the factor(s) that influence critical thinking skills in health science professional students. A concurrent triangulation mixed methods design was used in order to collect both quantitative and qualitative data concurrently and with equal weight. The quantitative design is descriptive and cross sectional, exploratory, and experimental to gather survey data on critical thinking scores and the potential factors influencing critical thinking. The qualitative design is a one phase convergent design to obtain different but complementary data on the same topic and to validate the quantitative with the qualitative to better understand the problem. One hundred and forty students from three private Universities' accredited BSN programs participated in this study.;Study results revealed that the overall critical thinking score of undergraduate nursing students was a moderate level as measure by the Health Science Reasoning Test (HSRT). There is a significant but weak relationship between critical thinking and job shadowing experiences (p= 0.10), between critical thinking and club involvement (p=.003), and between critical thinking and athletics (p=0.035). Students involved in clubs had significantly higher overall critical thinking scores than students not involved in clubs (p= 0.002). Students involved in athletics had significantly higher critical thinking scores than students not involved in athletics (p= 0.050). Surprisingly, the stepwise regression analysis revealed only 10% of the variance in the critical thinking scores due to the involvement of clubs and healthcare experience through job shadowing. Therefore, the difference in critical thinking scores must be due to other factors not explored here, and factors not predominantly mentioned in the literature as well. The qualitative component of the study revealed that the students were involved in more teacher centered learning activities and did not have a strong understanding of what critical thinking is and its importance.;This study lends support to the position that student centered learning will foster the development of critical thinking skills. The more interactive learning strategies, and opportunities for the students to form social and academic networks, the greater the development of critical thinking skills. Therefore by engaging in the active learning opportunities, the students will have the opportunity to further develop critical thinking skills by practicing and applying these skills, ultimately making them more productive, collaborative members of interprofessional education and practice.
机译:为了满足跨行业医疗保健实践的日益增长的需求,健康科学教育已经朝着跨专业教育的模式发展,该实践专注于提供高质量的以患者为中心的护理。这种医疗保健模式将改善患者的预后并提高医疗保健的整体效率。有效的保健实践和卫生专业学生的教育之间的另一个不可或缺的组成部分是批判性思维技能的发展。为了使医疗保健专业人员能够与患者及其家人以及彼此之间进行有效沟通,就像在跨行业实践中一样,需要批判性思维技巧。因此,批判性思维对于跨职业教育和随后的跨职业实践将是必要的。为了使跨专业的教育和实践有效,需要解决不同卫生专业中的批判性思维。批判性思维是一个多方面的概念,并受多种因素的影响。但是,在有关批判性思维的整个文献中,这些因素的影响并不一致。这项研究的主要目的是确定影响健康科学专业学生的批判性思维能力的因素。为了同时并以相等的权重收集定量和定性数据,使用了同时三角剖分混合方法设计。定量设计是描述性的,横断面的,探索性的和实验性的,以收集有关批判性思维得分和影响批判性思维的潜在因素的调查数据。定性设计是一种单阶段收敛设计,用于获取同一主题上不同但互补的数据,并通过定性验证定量以更好地理解问题。来自三所私立大学认可的BSN计划的140名学生参加了该研究。研究结果表明,根据健康科学推理测验(HSRT)的评估,本科护理学生的整体批判性思维得分处于中等水平。批判性思维与工作阴影经验之间(p = 0.10),批判性思维与俱乐部参与(p = .003)以及批判性思维与运动之间(p = 0.035)存在显着但微弱的关系。参与俱乐部的学生的整体批判性思维得分显着高于未参加俱乐部的学生(p = 0.002)。与不参加运动的学生相比,参加运动的学生的批判性思维得分显着高于未参加运动的学生(p = 0.050)。令人惊讶的是,逐步回归分析显示,由于俱乐部和通过工作影子进行的医疗保健经验的介入,批判性思维得分的差异仅占10%。因此,批判性思维得分的差异必须归因于此处未探讨的其他因素,以及文献中未主要提及的因素。该定性研究表明,学生参与了更多以教师为中心的学习活动,对什么是批判性思维及其重要性没有深刻的理解。该研究为以学生为中心的学习将促进发展的观点提供了支持。批判性思维能力。互动性越强的学习策略,以及学生形成社交和学术网络的机会,批判性思维技能的发展就越大。因此,通过积极的学习机会,学生将有机会通过实践和应用这些技能来进一步发展批判性思维技能,最终使他们成为跨专业教育和实践中更具生产力,更协作的成员。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mortellaro, Christina.;

  • 作者单位

    Seton Hall University.;

  • 授予单位 Seton Hall University.;
  • 学科 Health sciences.;Health education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 155 p.
  • 总页数 155
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号