首页> 外文学位 >Patchwork House: A Neighborhood Gathering.
【24h】

Patchwork House: A Neighborhood Gathering.

机译:拼布之家:社区聚会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The different ethnic groups of a given neighborhood often live within their invisible cultural boundaries and rarely connect with other groups -- either due to language barriers or lack of common interests. Each group's story is different, reflecting their socio-economic, cultural and political backgrounds. Yet when living next to one another, they create a single fabric of the neighborhood. This fabric can be compared to patchwork -- a textile composed of many different pieces sewn together to form a new design. The way patches connect with each other, organized in groups, and communicate on two different levels -- as a single piece and as an integral part of the total design -- all present a strong parallel with neighborhood organization, and serve as source of inspiration for this project.;The connections between different groups of people happen on the streets, in everyday life, and public places play the key role in biding residents together. Answering the question of how to design a public place that would bring diverse communities together and grasp the spirit of the neighborhood to connect visually with the residents is the key design goal of this project.;Columbia Heights (Washington, D.C.) serves as the neighborhood to study and create a design for. A constantly changing neighborhood, Columbia Heights presents a great mix of ethnic groups: situated between historically African-American neighborhoods to the east, the predominantly white neighborhood of Mt. Pleasant to the west, and the relatively recent but fast-growing Latino population to the south. Over the course of 20 years, the population mix has changed rapidly from 49 percent black and 13 percent Latino in 1980, to roughly equal parts white, black and Latino in 2000. The range of the residents' respective backgrounds makes this neighborhood one of the most diverse in Washington, D.C. Yet it seems that people there historically just happened to be in the same place at the same time. The neighborhood does not seem to create a sense of connection to its residents.;Gentrification in Columbia Heights that began in the late 1990s has improved the economic composition of the neighborhood, but at the same time watered down its local flavor by making neutral big-box stores, such as Giant and Target, the key visual markers of the neighborhood between 14th Street and Park Road. Of note, this neighborhood's historical center once was a commercial strip filled with private businesses that attracted shoppers from across the city.;Using patchwork as inspiration for this project, several modern artists' patchworks are studied to identify their strategies for creating a unifying language in design. The classical urban theories of Jane Jacobs and Christopher Alexander, as well as those of modern architects, are studied to develop spatial strategies for designing a public place. Using the methodology of "A Pattern Language" developed by Alexander, a study of the Columbia Heights neighborhood was conducted to identify the mixed-use program that the public place can offer to bring people together. Neighborhood visual observations, meeting with local developers (DCCH company), as well as interviews with local public artists (Karlisima and Joel Bergner), helped to clarify the sensibilities of different ethnic groups and identify directions to design the spirit of the neighborhood.;Local buildings (Red Apron, Room 11 of Washington D.C., and Counter Culture of NYC) are chosen as case studies for this project, which utilizes direct observations of their programs and design approaches. All of the buildings examined are adjoined townhouses, which in turn provides opportunity for an in-depth study of the connections between the buildings and the hierarchy of program in space.;While developing the program, the focus was placed on preserving the exterior diversity of the buildings, given their architectural and sentimental significance, yet unifying the interior via the natural flow of the program and transparent circulation between the buildings, creating moments of connection between the diverse community.
机译:由于语言障碍或缺乏共同利益,给定社区的不同种族通常生活在他们看不见的文化边界内,很少与其他群体联系。每个小组的故事都是不同的,反映了他们的社会经济,文化和政治背景。然而,当彼此毗邻居住时,它们会创造出一种邻里关系的单一结构。可以将这种织物与拼布进行比较-拼布是由许多不同的部分缝在一起以形成新设计的纺织品。补丁之间的连接方式,分组方式以及在两个不同级别上进行沟通的方式-既是整体设计又是整体设计的组成部分-都与邻里组织有着很强的相似性,并且可以作为灵感的来源在人群中,人们之间的联系发生在大街上,在日常生活中,而公共场所在吸引居民中起着关键作用。回答如何设计一个公共场所的问题,该项目的主要设计目标是如何设计一个公共场所,以使各种社区聚集在一起,并掌握社区的精神,以视觉方式与居民保持联系。哥伦比亚特区,华盛顿特区研究并创建设计。哥伦比亚高地(Columbia Heights)是一个不断变化的社区,呈现出多种种族:位于东部历史悠久的非裔美国人社区之间,主要是白山(Mt.西部宜人,南部是相对较新但增长迅速的拉丁裔人口。在过去的20年中,人口结构迅速变化,从1980年的49%的黑人和13%的拉丁美洲人,到2000年的白人,黑人和拉丁美洲人大致相等。居民的背景范围使得该社区成为人口中的一员。华盛顿特区最多样化的人然而,历史上似乎人们只是碰巧同时在同一地点。该社区似乎并没有建立与其居民的联系感。; 1990年代后期开始的哥伦比亚高地(Columbia Heights)的绅士化改善了该社区的经济构成,但与此同时,通过使中立的盒子商店,例如Giant和Target,这是第14街和Park Road之间的主要视觉标记。值得注意的是,该社区的历史中心曾经是一个商业街,到处都是私人企业,吸引了全市的购物者。以拼凑而成的灵感作为该项目的灵感,研究了几位现代艺术家的拼凑作品,以确定他们创造统一语言的策略。设计。简·雅各布斯(Jane Jacobs)和克里斯托弗·亚历山大(Christopher Alexander)等古典城市理论以及现代建筑师的理论都经过研究,以开发用于设计公共场所的空间策略。使用亚历山大(Alexander)开发的“一种模式语言”的方法,对哥伦比亚高地(Columbia Heights)社区进行了一项研究,以确定公共场所可以提供的将人们聚集在一起的混合用途计划。社区视觉观察,与本地开发人员(DCCH公司)会面以及对本地公共艺术家(Karlisima和Joel Bergner)的采访,有助于阐明不同种族群体的敏感性,并确定设计社区精神的方向。选择该建筑物(红色围裙,华盛顿特区的11号室和纽约市的反文化)作为该项目的案例研究,这些研究利用了对其程序和设计方法的直接观察。所有检查过的建筑物都是毗邻的联排别墅,这反过来又为深入研究建筑物与空间程序层次之间的联系提供了机会。在开发程序时,重点是保留建筑物的外部多样性。建筑物具有建筑和感性的意义,但通过程序的自然流程和建筑物之间的透明流通来统一内部,在各个社区之间建立了联系的时刻。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dumcheva, Tatiana.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Design.;Urban planning.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 105 p.
  • 总页数 105
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号