首页> 外文学位 >Evaluation of the environmental impacts of agricultural systems using life cycle thinking, focusing on marginal changes, technological advances, and regional characteristics.
【24h】

Evaluation of the environmental impacts of agricultural systems using life cycle thinking, focusing on marginal changes, technological advances, and regional characteristics.

机译:使用生命周期思想评估农业系统对环境的影响,重点是边际变化,技术进步和区域特征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Driven by rapid adoption and sustained improvements of genetic technologies and agronomic management practices, agricultural productivity has experienced a substantial growth worldwide since the start of the green revolution in 1960s. This growth has enabled the humanity to escape from the well-known Malthusian Trap. With the success in agricultural productivity, however, comes what is also known as "the other inconvenient truth" (Foley 2009). That is, modern agriculture has become one of the major drivers of global environmental change and is pushing the earth system beyond its safe operating boundaries (Rockstrom et al. 2009). Further, even more challenges lie ahead, given the growing number of population and increasing diversion of foods to fuels.;In this dissertation, three topics related to US agricultural systems are explored. In the first chapter, the environmental properties of US corn and cotton production and implications of land cover change from cotton to corn are evaluated using state-specific data and life cycle impact assessment. The results show that U.S. cotton and corn productions per hectare on average generate roughly similar impacts for most impact categories such as eutrophication and smog formation. Life cycle water use and freshwater ecotoxicity impacts of corn per hectare on average are smaller than those of cotton. When marginal impact is analyzed, however, the results show that the shifts from cotton to corn in cotton-growing states aggravates most of the regional environmental impacts while relieving freshwater ecotoxicity impact. The differences in the two estimates are due mainly to underlying regional disparities in crop suitability that affects input structure and environmental emissions.;In the second chapter, the carbon payback time (CPT) of corn ethanol expansion is re-examined considering three aspects: (1) yields of newly converted lands (i.e., marginal yield), (2) technology improvements over time within the corn ethanol system, and (3) temporal sensitivity of climate change impacts. The results show that without technological advances, the CPT estimates for corn ethanol from newly converted Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) land exceed 100 years for all Marginal to Average (MtA) yield ratios tested except for the case where MtA yield ratio is 100 %. When the productivity improvements within corn ethanol systems since previous CPT estimates and their future projections are considered, the CPT estimates fall into the range of 15 years (100 % MtA yield ratio) to 56 years (50 % MtA yield ratio), assuming land conversion takes place in early 2000s. Incorporating diminishing sensitivity of GHG emissions to future emissions year by year, however, increases the CPT estimates to17 to 88 years. For 60 MtA yield ratio, the CPT is estimated to be 43 years, which is relatively close to previous CPT estimates (i.e., 40 to 48 years) but with very different underlying reasons.;In the third chapter, the trends and underlying drivers of changes in non-global environmental impacts of major crops in the U.S. are investigated. The results show that the impact per hectare corn and cotton generated on the ecological health of freshwater systems decreased by about 50% in the last decade. This change is associated with the use of genetically modified (GM) crops, which has reduced the application of insecticides and relatively toxic herbicides such as atrazine. However, the freshwater water ecotoxicity impact per hectare soybean produced increased by 3-fold, mainly because the spread of invasive species, soybean aphid, has resulted in an increasing use of insecticides. In comparison, other impact categories remained relatively stable. By evaluating the relative ecotoxicity potential of a large number of pesticides, our analysis offers new insight into the benefits associated with genetically modified (GM) crops. The finding that different impact categories show different degrees of changes suggests that agricultural inventory data can be updated selectively in LCA to maximize cost-effectiveness.
机译:自从1960年代绿色革命开始以来,在遗传技术和农艺管理实践的迅速采用和持续改进的推动下,农业生产率在世界范围内实现了大幅增长。这种增长使人类摆脱了著名的马尔萨斯陷阱。然而,随着农业生产力的成功,随之而来的是“另一个不便的事实”(Foley 2009)。就是说,现代农业已经成为全球环境变化的主要驱动力之一,并且正在将地球系统推向其安全运行范围之外(Rockstrom等,2009)。此外,鉴于人口数量的增加和食品向燃料的转移的日益增加,未来的挑战仍在继续。本论文探讨了与美国农业系统相关的三个主题。在第一章中,使用州特定数据和生命周期影响评估来评估美国玉米和棉花生产的环境特性以及土地覆盖从棉花变为玉米的影响。结果表明,对于大多数影响类别(例如富营养化和烟雾形成),美国每公顷棉花和玉米的产量平均产生大致相似的影响。平均而言,每公顷玉米的生命周期耗水量和淡水生态毒性影响均小于棉花。但是,当分析边际影响时,结果表明,在棉花种植州,棉花从玉米向玉米的转移加剧了大部分区域环境影响,同时减轻了淡水的生态毒性影响。这两个估算值的差异主要是由于作物适应性的潜在区域差异影响了投入结构和环境排放。在第二章中,从三个方面重新审查了玉米乙醇膨胀的碳回收时间(CPT): 1)新转换土地的产量(即边际产量);(2)玉米乙醇系统内技术随时间的推移而改善;(3)气候变化影响的时间敏感性。结果表明,在没有技术进步的情况下,对于所有测试的边际至平均(MtA)收益率,新转换的自然保护区计划(CRP)土地对玉米乙醇的CPT估算都超过了100年,除非MtA收益率是100%。如果考虑自先前的CPT估算及其未来预测以来玉米乙醇系统内的生产率提高,则假定土地转换,CPT估算的范围为15年(100%MtA产量比)至56年(50%MtA产量比)发生在2000年代初期。然而,随着温室气体排放对未来排放的敏感性的逐年降低,CPT估计值将增加到17至88年。对于60 MtA的产量比,CPT估计为43年,与以前的CPT估计值(即40至48年)相对接近,但其根本原因却大不相同。在第三章中,CPT的趋势和潜在驱动因素调查了美国主要农作物对非全球环境的影响变化。结果表明,在过去十年中,每公顷玉米和棉花对淡水系统生态健康的影响减少了约50%。这种变化与转基因作物的使用有关,转基因作物减少了杀虫剂和毒性较小的除草剂(如阿特拉津)的使用。但是,每公顷大豆产生的淡水生态毒性影响增加了3倍,主要是因为入侵物种大豆蚜虫的扩散导致杀虫剂的使用增加。相比之下,其他影响类别保持相对稳定。通过评估大量农药的相对生态毒性潜力,我们的分析为转基因作物带来的益处提供了新的见解。不同影响类别显示不同程度变化的发现表明,可以在LCA中选择性地更新农业库存数据,以最大程度地提高成本效益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yang, Yi.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 Environmental science.;Agriculture.;Natural resource management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 123 p.
  • 总页数 123
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号