首页> 外文学位 >The relationship between proactive and reactive policing in allegations of misconduct.
【24h】

The relationship between proactive and reactive policing in allegations of misconduct.

机译:行为不端指控中的主动警务和被动警务之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Officers respond to a number of unpredictable and confrontational situations involving civilians daily. Being in such situations increases risk for numerous complaints and in turn, numerous allegations and investigations into their performance. Some research notes that proactive units are more prone to allegations of misconduct, which lead to investigative complaints, than that of reactive units. Investigative complaints are costly to the state, departments, and individual officers. Research regarding allegations of officer misconduct is limited and requires further investigation.;This study utilized archival data to explore four research questions to develop further understanding of allegations of officer misconduct and the outcomes of those allegations. Statistically significant differences in frequency of proactive and reactive officer allegations of misconduct were examined. Additionally, this study analyzed the proportion of those allegations which were exonerated and sustained. Furthermore, a more specific analysis was completed, determining the aforementioned analyses, but in specific relation to Use of Force allegations and outcomes.;In all, there were 296 units represented. For purposes of the analysis the units were coded as either reactive (N = 176) or proactive (N = 120). Primary interest was in statistically significant differences between the proactive and reactive units in respect to the number of allegations, those allegations that were use of force, as well as whether allegations were sustained or exonerated. Descriptive statistics, the t-test, z-test, and chi-square were employed to analyze the data, utilizing a.05 level as the criterion for statistical significance.;Analyses of these results found no difference between the proactive and reactive units in the number of allegations. There was no difference between the two types of units in the percentage of exonerations. However, within the units there were a greater percentage of exonerations than allegations that were sustained for the proactive group. The opposite occurred for the reactive units, as there were a greater percentage of sustained allegations. There was no overall statistical difference between the units for use of force allegations. Similarly, there was no statistical difference found between units when examining exonerated and sustained findings of use of force.
机译:军官每天都要应对许多涉及平民的不可预测的对抗性局势。处于这种情况下会增加无数投诉的风险,反过来又增加了对其性能进行的许多指控和调查。一些研究指出,与被动单位相比,主动单位更容易受到不当行为的指控,从而导致调查投诉。对于州,部门和个人官员而言,调查性投诉成本高昂。关于军官不当行为的指控的研究是有限的,需要进一步调查。本研究利用档案数据来探索四个研究问题,以进一步理解军官不当行为的指控和这些指控的结果。检查了对不当行为的主动和反应官员指控频率的统计学显着性差异。此外,这项研究分析了被免除和维持的那些指控的比例。此外,还完成了更具体的分析,确定了上述分析,但与使用武力的指控和结果有着特定关系。总共有296个单位。为了分析的目的,单位被编码为反应性的(N = 176)或主动的(N = 120)。首要关注的是主动和反动单位之间在指控数量,使用武力的指控以及指控是持续还是免除方面在统计学上的显着差异。采用描述性统计量,t检验,z检验和卡方检验来分析数据,以a.05级为统计显着性标准。;对这些结果的分析发现,前摄单元和反应单元之间没有差异。指控数量。两种类型的单位的免除百分比没有差异。但是,在单位内部,对免责小组的指控比对主动小组的指控更大。反应性单位则相反,持续指控的百分比更高。使用武力指控的单位之间没有总体统计差异。同样,检查免责和持续使用武力的结果时,各单位之间也没有统计差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Borilla, Michelle Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    Alliant International University.;

  • 授予单位 Alliant International University.;
  • 学科 Social psychology.;Criminology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 55 p.
  • 总页数 55
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号