首页> 外文学位 >Farming in the commons, fishing in the Congress and U.S. aquaculture in the 21st century.
【24h】

Farming in the commons, fishing in the Congress and U.S. aquaculture in the 21st century.

机译:在21世纪,在公地进行耕种,在国会捕鱼和美国水产养殖。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Fisheries and aquaculture policy in the United States exhibits a peculiar duality. Commercial fishing is functionally open-access, heavily subsidized, and regulated by a federal bureaucracy staffed in part by fishing industry representatives. Marine aquaculture, in contrast, is effectively forbidden. Today there are no functioning fish farms anywhere in the federal waters of the United States, largely due to a regulatory environment that discourages applications for aquaculture permits. This bifurcated policy does not seem to be dependent on any specific environmental or economic rationale. Instead, this policy appears to be the product of a series of individual assumptions and policy choices that may have been initially reasonable, but have since accreted into an unworkable whole. This dissertation consists of a series of unique, but thematically connected research projects designed to examine current U.S. policy on aquaculture and fishing in the United States, and the assumptions that inform that policy, with the goal of informing a more consistent treatment for these two modes of seafood production. Chapter 1 introduces the dissertation by reframing the discussion of aquaculture and fishing, by examining the global importance of aquaculture as a productive system, and by discussing the blurring line between fishing and aquaculture. This chapter also provides a roadmap for the rest of the dissertation. Chapter 2 examines the federal fisheries management system in light of historical reality and public choice theory. Chapter 3 describes the nutrient footprint of an offshore aquaculture facility. Chapter 4 uses disclosures from the federal lobbying disclosure system to examine the patterns of advocacy around aquaculture and fishing in the U.S. Congress and administrative agencies. Chapter 5 concludes the dissertation with a few thoughts on the value of interdisciplinarity in pursuing further research into aquaculture and fisheries policy in the United States.
机译:美国的渔业和水产养殖政策具有独特的二重性。商业捕鱼在功能上是开放式的,受到大量补贴,并受到联邦官僚机构的管理,而联邦官僚机构的一部分是渔业专家。相反,有效地禁止海水养殖。如今,在美国联邦水域的任何地方都没有运转中的养鱼场,这在很大程度上是由于监管环境不利于水产养殖许可证的申请。这种分叉的政策似乎并不取决于任何特定的环境或经济原理。取而代之的是,该政策似乎是一系列个人假设和政策选择的产物,这些假设和政策选择最初可能是合理的,但此后却被认为是不可行的整体。本论文包括一系列独特但主题相关的研究项目,旨在研究美国当前在美国的水产养殖和渔业政策,以及为该政策提供依据的假设,目的是为这两种模式提供更一致的待遇海鲜生产。第1章通过重新讨论水产养殖和渔业的讨论,研究水产养殖作为一种生产系统的全球重要性以及讨论渔业和水产养殖之间的模糊界限来介绍论文。本章还为其余的论文提供了路线图。第2章根据历史现实和公共选择理论研究了联邦渔业管理系统。第3章介绍了近海水产养殖设施的营养足迹。第4章使用联邦游说披露系统的披露来研究美国国会和行政机构围绕水产养殖和捕鱼的倡导模式。第五章在总结全文的基础上,对跨学科性在美国进一步研究水产养殖和渔业政策方面的价值进行了思考。

著录项

  • 作者

    Welch, Aaron.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Miami.;

  • 授予单位 University of Miami.;
  • 学科 Environmental science.;Biological oceanography.;Ecology.;Political science.;Environmental law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 195 p.
  • 总页数 195
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号