首页> 外文学位 >Unmanned Aerial Systems for Surveying and Mapping: Cost Comparison of UAS Versus Traditional Methods of Data Acquisition
【24h】

Unmanned Aerial Systems for Surveying and Mapping: Cost Comparison of UAS Versus Traditional Methods of Data Acquisition

机译:用于测绘的无人机系统:UAS与传统数据采集方法的成本比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Commercial, government and private use of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) are rapidly expanding in the United States. Although commercial use of UAS is still limited to a case by case basis, the Federal Aviation Administration began allowing companies to petition for use of UAS for commercial purposes. As of October 30th, 2015, 2020 exemptions have been granted to companies in various industries. Those companies approved to use UAS for surveying see a need for the technology, but must also weigh the capabilities and limitations of UAS to acquire and process survey data against those of more traditional methods. This study sought to answer the question of whether or not using UAS for topographic mapping and volumetric surveying can lower the cost and time to complete the same task using land surveying and manned aircraft systems while still achieving acceptable accurate results. This study compares the use of UAS within the surveying and mapping industry with traditional and accepted methods and provides a comparison of their use. Specifically, this thesis reports on tests comparing UAS data acquisition and processing for volumetric calculation and topographic mapping. Time, accuracy, and cost were compared between UAS and traditional survey methods. The results of this study showed that using UAS for topographic mapping and calculating volumes is more time and cost efficient than land surveying, with no loss in accuracy, but only when performed over bare earth terrain. The results also showed UAS to be more time and cost effective than using terrestrial Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), but with less accurate results. The author is currently employed as the Flight Operations Manager for a large surveying and mapping firm, and the position involves the day-to-day remote acquisition of survey data through the use of aerial LiDAR and aerial photography, as well as the establishment of a UAS department within the company. In addition, flight of all kinds, both manned and unmanned, has been a passion of the author since becoming an aviator in the United States Army in 2004.
机译:在美国,商业,政府和私人用途的无人机系统(UAS)都在迅速扩展。尽管UAS的商业用途仍然仅限于具体情况,但美国联邦航空管理局开始允许公司为商业目的使用UAS提出请愿。自2015年10月30日起,各个行业的公司已获得2020年的豁免。那些被批准使用UAS进行测量的公司认为需要该技术,但还必须权衡UAS在获取和处理测量数据方面的能力和局限性与传统方法相比。这项研究试图回答以下问题:使用UAS进行地形制图和体积测量是否可以降低使用土地测量和载人飞机系统完成同一任务的成本和时间,同时仍能获得可接受的准确结果。这项研究将UAS在测绘行业中的使用与传统的和公认的方法进行了比较,并对其使用进行了比较。具体而言,本文报道了比较UAS数据采集和处理以进行体积计算和地形图绘制的测试。比较了UAS和传统调查方法的时间,准确性和成本。这项研究的结果表明,使用UAS进行地形制图和计算体积比土地测量更节省时间和成本,并且准确性没有损失,仅在裸露的地面上执行时才有效。结果还表明,与使用地面光检测和测距(LiDAR)相比,UAS在时间和成本上更具成本效益,但结果准确性较低。作者目前是一家大型测绘公司的飞行运营经理,其职位涉及通过使用航空LiDAR和航空摄影以及建立一个公司内的UAS部门。此外,自2004年成为美国陆军飞行员以来,各种各样的载人和无人飞行都引起了作者的热情。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fitzpatrick, Bryan Phillip.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Geographic information science and geodesy.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 53 p.
  • 总页数 53
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号