首页> 外文学位 >TOWARD A LITERARY HISTORY OF THE SUBJECT: A READING OF ROUSSEAU'S CONFESSIONS AND BLAKE'S VISIONARY EPICS
【24h】

TOWARD A LITERARY HISTORY OF THE SUBJECT: A READING OF ROUSSEAU'S CONFESSIONS AND BLAKE'S VISIONARY EPICS

机译:迈向该学科的文学史:对罗素的自白和布莱克的视觉史诗的解读

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study contends that a reassessment of the idea of the human subject is necessary if contemporary literary theory and interpretive practice are to take into account developments in Continental thought such as semiotics which have supplanted the traditional notion of the individual as an autonomous subject with a consideration of those material forces such as language and culture which inform our understanding of human subjective existence. The study attempts to establish the historical foundation of a model of the subject which will be of value to contemporary theory in assimilating this challenge to the idea of the autonomous individual.;The essay is based on two key notions elaborated by Michel Foucault in Les Mots et les choses. First he contends that at the end of the eighteenth century Western thought began to consider the individual as a subject, a place where those forces which shape the understanding manifest their power. Secondly he proposes that literary texts also exhibit the influence of these forces. So this study argues that a reading of late eighteenth and early nineteenth century texts will yield a record of the notion of the human being as a subject which Foucault maintains was then emerging and which in his view still influences Western thought.;The first chapter treats the need for a new theory of the subject, Foucault's ideas on cultural history and their relation to the subject, and then proposes a method for reading the works of Rousseau and Blake in order to determine the model of the subject which they use. In each instance the reading will first establish the dominant organizing strategy at work in the text and then consider the notion of the subject which results from the choice and use of this strategy.;The second chapter identifies as Rousseau's principal textual strategy the creation of fictions, inaccessible states against which he defines and understands human existence. It examines the nature state of the Second Discourse and Julie's idea of her life after death in Julie as examples of fictions by which Rousseau resolves the struggle of passion and will which for him divides human experience. Chapter III then undertakes a reading of selected incidents from the later books of the Confessions and passages from the Reveries. This reading contends that Rousseau in his autobiographical writings establishes a fiction of society as a force which imposes social roles against the will of the individual and then defines himself as a subject by attempting to demonstrate that he does not conform to his fictional model of how society functions.;The fourth chapter outlines Blake's evocation of apocalypse or the transformation of the world as the strategy which organizes his poetry. It reads "The Tiger," The First Book of Urizen, and Vala in order to show the way in which Blake conceives of apocalypse as the reversal of the misperceptions which prevent the human imagination from viewing the imperfections of the world as the source of its regeneration. Chapter V looks at Milton and Jerusalem as Blake's description of the process by which a subject acquires visionary perception, transforms the world, and as a result injects itself into a new form of social life which makes each individual an element within a regenerate, corporate form of society.;Chapter VI maintains that despite their very different organizing strategies these two groups of texts reveal a notion of the subject as a split entity forced to confront within itself the influence of those outside powers (society for Rousseau, regenerate humanity for Blake) which define the conditions of its existence. The chapter concludes by arguing that this model must serve as the basis of any notion of the subject invoked by contemporary literary theory and practice.
机译:这项研究认为,如果要考虑当代文学理论和解释实践,考虑到诸如符号学之类的大陆思想的发展,人类主体思想的重新评估是必要的,而符号学则取代了个人作为自主主体的传统观念。语言和文化等物质力量有助于我们理解人类的主观存在。这项研究试图建立该主题模型的历史基础,该模型在将这一挑战吸收到自治个人的思想中时,对当代理论具有参考价值。这篇文章是基于米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)在《莱斯·莫茨》中阐述的两个关键概念等选择。首先,他认为,在18世纪末,西方思想开始将个人视为主体,在这个地方,形成理解的力量展现了自己的力量。其次,他提出文学作品也要表现出这些力量的影响。因此,本研究认为,阅读18世纪末和19世纪初的文本将记录人类的观念,因为福柯认为人类是一个新兴学科,在他看来,它仍然影响西方思想。需要一个新的主题理论,即福柯关于文化历史的思想及其与主题的关系,然后提出一种阅读卢梭和布莱克作品的方法,以确定他们所使用的主题的模型。在每种情况下,阅读材料都会首先在文本中建立起主导性的组织策略,然后再考虑选择和使用该策略所产生的主题概念。第二章将小说的创作作为卢梭的主要文本策略。 ,是他无法定义和理解人类生存的状态。它考察了第二话语的自然状态以及朱莉在朱莉死后的生活观念,以此作为卢梭解决激情和意志斗争的小说实例,而卢梭则将他的人生经历与众不同。然后,第三章从《告白》的后续书籍和《遐想》的段落中选读了一些事件。这种解读认为,卢梭在他的自传体著作中确立了一种社会小说,将其作为一种强加于个人意愿的社会角色的力量,然后通过试图证明他不符合他关于社会如何使用的虚构模型来将自己定义为主体。第四章概述了布雷克对世界末日的唤起或对世界的改造,以此作为组织其诗歌的策略。它读了《老虎》,《乌里森第一书》和《瓦拉》,目的是说明布雷克认为启示是对错误观念的逆转,这种误解阻止了人类的想象力将世界的不完美之处视为其不完整之处。再生。第五章将米尔顿和耶路撒冷视为布雷克对主体获得远见,改造世界,并由此将自身注入一种新的社会生活形式的过程的描述,该过程使每个人成为再生的公司形式中的一个元素第六章认为,尽管这两类文本的组织策略截然不同,但它们揭示了该主题的概念,认为它是一个分裂的实体,被迫在自身内部对抗那些外部大国的影响(卢梭社会,布雷克复兴人类)。定义了它存在的条件。本章的结论是,该模型必须作为当代文学理论和实践所引用的任何主题概念的基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    GRIFFIN, PAUL FRANCIS.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Comparative literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1981
  • 页码 328 p.
  • 总页数 328
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号