The effects of selected extra-evidential factors on the decision-making of mock jurors were investigated. The propositions of Equity Theory were employed as a conceptual framework for understanding the dynamics of the judicial process.;The present research was designed to replicate and extend the findings of the prototype mock juror study conducted by Landy and Aronson (1966). The experimental procedures employed by Landy and Aronson were adapted for use in the current research. In addition to the traditional predictions regarding the impact of the participants' relative character attractiveness, the present study investigated the impact of mock jurors' Just World Belief on their sentencing behavior. It was hypothesized that mock jurors reporting high Just World Belief would sentence defendants to longer prison terms than jurors with low Just World Belief.;The results of the data analyses provided partial support for the Landy and Aronson hypotheses and failed to support the predictions regarding Just World Belief. The absence of the effect of the defendant's character attractiveness on the sentencing behavior of mock jurors was attributed to the intervention of the potentially confounding variable of defendant suffering.;Comparison of the sentencing patterns of the high and low Just World Belief jurors suggested that high believers may base their sentencing decisions, in part, on the attributes of the victim, and low believers may base their sentencing decisions, in part, on the attributes of the defendant.;Finally, an extension of the equity theory formula was proposed. It was suggested that future research focus upon the verification of the elements and relationships described in the extension formula.
展开▼
机译:研究了选定的超证据因素对模拟陪审员决策的影响。公平理论的命题被用作理解司法程序动态的概念框架。本研究旨在复制和扩展由兰迪和阿隆森(Landy and Aronson(1966))进行的模拟陪审员研究的结果。 Landy和Aronson所采用的实验程序已被修改用于当前研究。除了关于参与者相对性格吸引力的影响的传统预测之外,本研究还研究了模拟陪审员的正义世界信仰对其量刑行为的影响。有人假设,虚假陪审员报告的正义世界信仰较高,与低正义世界信仰的陪审员相比,判处被告更长的刑期。数据分析的结果为兰迪和阿隆森的假设提供了部分支持,但未能支持有关正义正义的预测。世界信仰。被告人格魅力对模拟陪审员的量刑行为没有影响是由于对被告人痛苦的潜在混杂变量的干预所致;《正义世界》(Just World Belief)陪审员的高低判决方式的比较表明,高信徒低信徒可能部分地根据受害者的属性来决定他们的判决,低信徒可能部分地根据被告的属性来决定他们的判决;最后,提出了公平理论公式的扩展。建议未来的研究重点放在扩展公式中描述的元素和关系的验证上。
展开▼