首页> 外文学位 >TOWARD A THEORY OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE.
【24h】

TOWARD A THEORY OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE.

机译:走向图书馆学和情报学理论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present inquiry addresses the problem of an adequate definition of the domain of library and information science. Such a definition must be formulated according to the rigor of logic, for it is patent that mapping out a scholarly domain is more than an act of self-evident discovery. Discourse about a domain does not arrange itself in social reality; it must be rendered explicit. Concepts must be expressed as a system of linguistic terms.; Such a terminological system is a necessary condition for the development among a community of researchers and practitioners of a consensus on the fundamental problems posed in their inquiry and service activities. Without this consensus in the community, progress in conceptualization is impeded, and so knowledge cannot advance.; The present research applies logical and conceptual analysis to the task of defining the domain of library and information science. First, extant definitions are examined from the literature (in English, to 1981) and their diverse usage of terms is set forth. Basic concepts are identified and for each basic concept the synonymous terms are brought together. In this way a typology of generic definitions is developed. Then, the logical adequacy of each generic definition is considered.; The analysis reveals a profound depth of confusion, disagreement, contradiction, and inconsistency over the past 100 years about the proper characterization of the domain. More than 1,500 definitions of it are documented here, and they contain over 340 synonymous, quasi-synonymous, and pseudo-synonymous terms purporting to capture its essence. Nowhere are the flawed claims more apparent than in the efforts to tease apart a domain of information science (itself only one among many fuzzy terms) from that of library science.; The dissertation then introduces the SIGGS metatheory, an extension of general system theory, as a way of enhancing domain conceptualization. In this enhancement, library and information science is taken to be a system of human social practice in which one person facilitates access to selected cultural objects on behalf of another person who is seeking access to them. The practice so characterized is the 'symbolic culture accessing system'.; The present work argues that this conception provides a more adequate and more powerful description of the domain than those definitions so far posited. As such, it constitutes a rudimentary descriptive theory of library and information science and so holds some promise of focusing the community's long-awaited consensus.
机译:本次调查解决了对图书馆和信息科学领域进行适当定义的问题。这样的定义必须根据逻辑的严谨性来制定,因为将学术领域规划出来不仅仅是一项不言而喻的发现,这是专利。关于领域的论述并没有使自己适应社会现实;必须将其显式显示。概念必须表达为语言术语系统。这种术语系统是研究人员和从业人员之间就其查询和服务活动中所存在的基本问题达成共识的必要条件。没有社区内的共识,就无法在概念化方面取得进展,因此知识无法发展。本研究将逻辑和概念分析应用于定义图书馆和信息科学领域的任务。首先,从文献(英语,到1981年)中研究现有的定义,并阐述它们的各种用法。确定基本概念,并且对于每个基本概念,将同义术语组合在一起。以这种方式,开发了通用定义的类型。然后,考虑每个通用定义的逻辑适当性。分析揭示了在过去100年中,对于域的正确表征存在着极大的混乱,分歧,矛盾和矛盾。此处记录了1,500多个定义,其中包含340多个旨在抓住其本质的同义词,准同义词和伪同义词。有缺陷的主张没有什么比将信息科学的一个领域(它本身只是许多模糊术语中的一个)与图书馆科学的领域分开来的努力更为明显的。然后,论文介绍了SIGGS元理论,它是通用系统理论的扩展,是增强领域概念化的一种方法。在这种增强中,图书馆和信息科学被视为人类社会实践的一种系统,其中一个人代表另一个寻求获取文化遗产的人,为获取选定的文化遗产提供便利。如此具有特色的实践是“象征文化访问系统”。当前的工作认为,与迄今为止提出的定义相比,该概念为领域提供了更充分,更强大的描述。因此,它构成了图书馆和信息科学的基本描述性理论,因此有望将重点放在社区期待已久的共识上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号