首页> 外文学位 >ACHIEVEMENT DIFFERENCES IN GIFTED CHILDREN: POSSIBLE NON-INTELLECTIVE FACTORS.
【24h】

ACHIEVEMENT DIFFERENCES IN GIFTED CHILDREN: POSSIBLE NON-INTELLECTIVE FACTORS.

机译:有天赋的儿童的成就差异:可能的非智力因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An attempt was made to understand achievement differences in gifted children by examining several non-intellective factors, including students' feelings of responsibility for their academic success and failure, achievement behaviors, and academic self-concept.;Each subject was administered the Sydney Attribution Scale, measuring causal explanations for success and failure in reading and math, two experimental tasks measuring persistence and risk preference, and an academic self-concept scale. In addition, classroom teachers were asked to rate the subjects on persistence and risk preference behaviors in the classroom.;Separate analyses were done for students in the reading and math groups to analyze for the effect of achievement differences in reading and math on attributions, achievement behaviors, and self-concept. Sex differences were also included in the analyses as a related variable.;Results found no significant differences between AAA-read and BAA-read or AAA-math and BAA-math in their effort attributions for reading and math success and failure. AAA-math, however, did attribute their math success to ability significantly more than BAA-math. Also, females took less responsibility for their math success than males, attributing it to external factors. In contrast, females took more responsibility for their reading success, attributing it to effort.;Fifty eight highly gifted children (IQ 136-160) were categorized as either above average achievers or below average achievers in reading (AAA-read; BAA-read) and/or math (AAA-math; BAA-math) on the basis of current test scores on the California Test of Basic Skills.;AAA-read and AAA-math tended to prefer more difficult tasks than BAA-read and BAA-math, and were also rated by teachers as more persistent in the classroom.;Finally, AAA-read and AAA-math had a significantly more positive academic self-concept than BAA-read and BAA-math.;These findings have some important implications for teachers of gifted students and suggest that achievement level in such students might be enhanced by reinforcing greater feelings of personal control, more willingness to attempt difficult tasks, and a more positive academic self-concept.
机译:试图通过检查一些非智力因素来理解有天赋的孩子的成就差异,包括学生对其学业成败的责任感,成就行为和学业自我概念。;每个科目都被管理了悉尼归因量表,衡量阅读和数学成败的因果解释,衡量持久性和风险偏好的两个实验性任务以及学术上的自我概念量表。此外,还要求课堂老师对课堂上的持久性和风险偏好行为进行评分;对阅读和数学组的学生分别进行分析,以分析阅读和数学中的成就差异对归因,成就的影响行为和自我概念。性别差异也作为相关变量包括在分析中。结果未发现AAA阅读和BAA阅读或AAA数学和BAA数学在阅读和数学成功与失败的努力归因上没有显着差异。但是,AAA数学确实将他们的数学成功归因于能力,远胜于BAA数学。另外,女性对数学成绩的责任比男性要少,这归因于外部因素。相比之下,女性对阅读成功负有更多责任,这归功于努力。; 58名有天赋的孩子(IQ 136-160)被分类为阅读成绩高于平均水平或低于平均成绩(AAA阅读; BAA阅读) )和/或数学(AAA-math; BAA-math)的基础上,根据加利福尼亚州基本技能测试的当前考试分数。; AAA-read和AAA-math倾向于比BAA-read和BAA-reader更难的任务数学,也被老师评为在课堂上更具有持久性。最后,AAA-read和AAA-math具有比BAA-read和BAA-math更积极的学术自我概念。这些发现有一些重要的启示。对于有天赋的学生的老师,并建议通过增强个人控制感,尝试困难任务的意愿和更积极的学术自我概念来提高此类学生的成就水平。

著录项

  • 作者

    BENNETT, LINDA E.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Special education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 121 p.
  • 总页数 121
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号