首页> 外文学位 >A COMPARISON OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION WITH PRESCRIPTION LEARNING AND THE TRADITIONAL 'PULL-OUT' PROGRAM USED IN SUPPLEMENTING INSTRUCTION OF MATHEMATICS BASIC SKILLS TO CHAPTER I (TITLE I) STUDENTS.
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION WITH PRESCRIPTION LEARNING AND THE TRADITIONAL 'PULL-OUT' PROGRAM USED IN SUPPLEMENTING INSTRUCTION OF MATHEMATICS BASIC SKILLS TO CHAPTER I (TITLE I) STUDENTS.

机译:计算机辅助教学与处方学习的比较,以及传统的“拔出”程序用于将数学基本技能的教学补充到第一章(标题I)的学生。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the Chapter I supplemental mathematics program CAI with other Chapter I supplemental mathematics programs, Prescription Learning and the traditional "pull-out" program, in terms of achievement and retention of mathematics basic skills.;There were 577 Chapter I students from 12 middle schools and 3 elementary schools in the Portland Public School District in Portland, Oregon, who participated in the study. The subjects in the three treatment groups, CAI, Prescription Learning, and the traditional "pull-out" program, were naturally assembled.;Students in all treatment groups were pretested prior to their treatment. After one academic year, subjects were post-tested. The fall to spring difference in scores was used to measure achievement. Subjects were post-tested again in the succeeding fall. The difference in the first post-test and the second post-test was used to determine retention over the summer months. The criterion instrument used was the Portland Achievement Levels Tests.;A one-way analysis of covariance with the pretest as the covariate measure was used to statistically test the null hypotheses. F-ratios were computed and evaluated to determine whether group differences on criterion measures were significant.;The Findings. Four hypotheses were tested in this study. Two were related to achievement and two were related to retention. The results of testing the hypotheses indicated: (1) The achievement of Chapter I students receiving CAI supplemental instruction in mathematics basic skills is significantly higher than the achievement of Chapter I students receiving supplemental mathematics instruction by either Prescription Learning or the traditional "pull-out" program; and (2) The retention of Chapter I students receiving CAI supplemental instruction in mathematics basic skills is not significantly different from the retention of Chapter I students receiving supplemental mathematics instruction in basic skills by either Prescription Learning or the traditional "pull-out" program.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较第一章的补充数学程序CAI与其他第一章的补充数学程序,处方学习和传统的“拔出”程序,它们在达到和保留数学基本技能方面;共有577个。来自俄勒冈州波特兰市波特兰公立学区的12所中学和3所小学的第一章学生参加了这项研究。三个治疗组(CAI,处方学习和传统的“抽出式”程序)中的受试者是自然组装的;所有治疗组中的学生在治疗前均经过了预测试。一学年后,对科目进行了后测。秋季至春季的分数差异用于衡量成绩。受试者在随后的秋季再次进行了后测。第一次测试后和第二次测试后的差异用于确定夏季的保留率。所使用的标准工具是波特兰成就水平测试。;以协方差量度作为预变量的单因素协方差分析用于统计检验原假设。计算和评估F比率以确定标准量度的组差异是否显着。在这项研究中检验了四个假设。两个与成就有关,两个与保留有关。检验假设的结果表明:(1)第一章接受数学基础技能的CAI补充教学的学生的成绩明显高于第一章接受处方学习或传统的“拉出式”数学教学的学生的成绩。 ”程序; (2)第一章接受数学基础技能CAI补充教学的学生的保留与第一章接受处方学习或传统的“拉出”程序接受基础数学补充教学的学生的保留没有显着差异。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Oregon State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oregon State University.;
  • 学科 Mathematics education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 162 p.
  • 总页数 162
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号