首页> 外文学位 >ANTHROPOD PREDATORS AND HELIOTHIS SPP. IN COTTON, GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.: A COMPARISON OF THREE SAMPLING METHODS FOR DETERMINING SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION.
【24h】

ANTHROPOD PREDATORS AND HELIOTHIS SPP. IN COTTON, GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.: A COMPARISON OF THREE SAMPLING METHODS FOR DETERMINING SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION.

机译:拟人定食者和幽门螺杆菌。棉中的棉铃虫:测定空间分布的三种采样方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Three sampling methods were used to collect data on selected predators and Heliothis spp. in cotton to determine their spatial distribution and sampling method reliability. Predators sampled were: Geocoris punctipes (Say), Notoxus monodons (F.), Orius insidiosus (Say), Reduviolus roseipennis (Reuter) and spiders. The three sampling methods used were: bag capture, ground-cloth and terminal.; Predatory arthropod populations were relatively low in 1979 and 1980. Peak predator abundance occurred one month later in 1979 than in 1980. G. punctipes and N. monodons were the most abundant predators in 1979 and 1980.; Ground-cloth sampling proved significantly (p = 0.05) better than the bag capture or teriminal methods for estimating overall predator populations. Efficiency was based on the ability to detect numbers in sparse populations and also on low coefficients of variation (CV's). The CV's supported the results among sampling methods. The CV's for all methods were high and indicated large variations from the means.; Efficiency of sampling Heliothis spp. eggs was approximately equal using the bag capture and terminal methods. The mean number of eggs counted was similar and supports the observations on the ovipositional behavior of Heliothis spp. adults. The bag capture method was significantly better than the ground-cloth and terminal methods for sampling first-instar and small larvae. Both the bag capture and ground-cloth methods were significantly better than the terminal method for sampling large larvae. The CV's for the methods reflected the efficiency of the bag capture method over the ground-cloth and terminal methods.; Dispersion indices indicated that populations of predators were slightly clumped but less skewed than indicated by a negative binomial distribution. Ground-cloth sampling indicated the predators fitted the Poisson distribution. Notoxus monodons fitted the Poisson, Thomas double Poisson and Poisson with zeros distributions.; The spatial distribution of Heliothis spp. eggs was Poisson as indicated by the terminal method. However, the terminal method produced a larger number of data sets than did the bag capture method. Heliothis spp. first-instar, small and large larvae fitted the Poisson distribution best.
机译:三种采样方法被用来收集选定的天敌和Heliothis spp的数据。确定棉花的空间分布和抽样方法的可靠性。捕食的食肉动物有:象鼻虫(Geocoris punctipes)(Say),斑节对虾(Notoxus monodons)(Say),红斑Or(Orius insidiosus)(Say),玫瑰红(Reduviolus roseipennis)(Reuter)和蜘蛛。所使用的三种采样方法是:袋捕获,底布和终端。 1979年和1980年捕食性节肢动物的数量相对较低。1979年比1980年晚了一个月,捕食者的高峰出现了。1979年和1980年,点状。和斑节对虾是最丰富的捕食者。事实证明,相比布袋捕获或终端方法来估计捕食者的总数量,地布采样方法显着更好(p = 0.05)。效率基于检测稀疏种群中数字的能力,还基于低变异系数(CV)。简历支持抽样方法中的结果。所有方法的CV值很高,表明均值有很大差异。采样Heliothis spp的效率。使用袋捕获和终端方法,卵大约相等。卵的平均计数是相似的,并支持对Heliothis spp产卵行为的观察。大人。对于初生幼虫和小幼虫,袋捕获法明显优于底布法和末端法。袋捕获法和底布法均比终端法对大型幼虫的采样要好得多。这些方法的CV反映了袋捕获方法相对于底布方法和终端方法的效率。色散指数表明,与负二项式分布所表明的相比,捕食者的种群略有成簇,但偏斜程度较小。底布采样表明捕食者符合泊松分布。 Notoxus monodons使Poisson,Thomas double Poisson和Poisson具有零分布。 Heliothis spp的空间分布。如终末方法所示,卵为泊松。但是,终端方法产生的数据集比袋子捕获方法要多。太阳神菌一龄幼虫,大小幼虫最适合Poisson分布。

著录项

  • 作者

    ADAMS, DAVID BERNARR.;

  • 作者单位

    Clemson University.;

  • 授予单位 Clemson University.;
  • 学科 Biology Entomology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 75 p.
  • 总页数 75
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 昆虫学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号