首页> 外文学位 >A COMPOSITE MEASURE FOR WEIGHTING DATABASES IN DEFENSE, ENGINEERING, AND SCIENCE (MULTIDATABASE SEARCHING, ONLINE SEARCHING, DIALINDEX).
【24h】

A COMPOSITE MEASURE FOR WEIGHTING DATABASES IN DEFENSE, ENGINEERING, AND SCIENCE (MULTIDATABASE SEARCHING, ONLINE SEARCHING, DIALINDEX).

机译:国防,工程学和科学中加权数据库的一种综合措施(多数据库搜索,在线搜索,DIALINDEX)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The primary problem of this dissertation is to propose a composite measure as a technique for measuring the relevancy of databases. The databases are characterized as single units by the measure of closeness, C(,M), values. The measure of closeness consists of two weighted factors: (1) a relevance factor, and (2) a descriptive factor. The relevance factor is the sum of the recall and precision ratios. The descriptive factor is the sum of the weighted properties of each file as follows: (1) subject coverage, (2) thesaurus strength, (3) technical level, (4) subject coding, and (5) length of years searched retrospectively.;For each of the seven topics, online searches were performed on a group of databases. These databases, ranked according to C(,M) values, were compared with their corresponding databases ranked by retrievals from DIALINDEX, a Dialog multidatabase file. The first experiment compared six randomly selected Dialog files and Dialog files subjectively selected for their expected higher relevance to the topics. While randomly selected files retrieved some relevant citations, these files generally did not contain many relevant citations. The second experiment compared the DIALINDEX method and the measure of closeness, C(,M), technique.;Mann-Whitney two rank and Spearman Rho rank correlation tests failed to indicate conclusively that the DIALINDEX method is different from use of the weighted measure of closeness alone. The tests did indicate DIALINDEX term frequency retrievals appear to result in ranking relevant databases. Possible artificial intelligence designs may further enhance the future modelling of weighting schemes for more effective multivendor and multidatabase online search techniques.;Only unclassified terms, titles and/or abstracts were discussed in order to conform to U.S. national security requirements.;Two experiments were conducted to test if the measure of closeness may be utilized to select the relevant databases in DIALINDEX searches in the general areas of defense, engineering, and science. Databases from Dialog Information Services, Inc., Defense Logistics Studies Information Exchange, Defense Technical Information Center, Mead Data Central Nexis, NASA/RECON, and DOE/RECON were also used. Searches were conducted in seven sample topics: (1) composites, (2) missiles, (3) rockets, (4) sonar, (5) torpedoes, (6) underwater acoustics, and (7) underwater weapons.
机译:本文的主要问题是提出一种综合措施作为一种测量数据库相关性的技术。数据库通过紧密度C(,M)值的度量来表征为单个单位。接近度的度量包括两个加权因子:(1)相关因子和(2)描述因子。相关系数是召回率和精确率之和。描述性因素是每个文件的加权属性的总和,如下所示:(1)主题覆盖率,(2)词库强度,(3)技术水平,(4)主题编码和(5)追溯搜索的年限。 ;对于这七个主题中的每一个,在线搜索都是在一组数据库上进行的。将这些根据C(,M)值排名的数据库与通过从Dialog多数据库文件DIALINDEX检索而排名的相应数据库进行比较。第一个实验比较了六个随机选择的Dialog文件和主观选择的Dialog文件,这些文件与主题的预期相关性更高。虽然随机选择的文件检索了一些相关的引用,但是这些文件通常不包含许多相关的引用。第二个实验比较了DIALINDEX方法和接近度C(,M)技术.Mann-Whitney二级秩和Spearman Rho秩相关检验未能最终表明DIALINDEX方法不同于加权法的使用。亲密无间。测试确实表明DIALINDEX术语频率检索似乎可以对相关数据库进行排名。可能的人工智能设计可能会进一步增强加权方案的未来建模,以实现更有效的多供应商和多数据库在线搜索技术。;仅讨论未分类的术语,标题和/或摘要以符合美国国家安全要求;进行了两次实验测试在国防,工程和科学等一般领域的DIALINDEX搜索中,是否可以利用接近程度来选择相关数据库。还使用了Dialog信息服务公司,国防后勤研究信息交换所,国防技术信息中心,米德数据中心Nexis,NASA / RECON和DOE / RECON的数据库。搜索进行了七个示例主题:(1)复合材料,(2)导弹,(3)火箭,(4)声纳,(5)鱼雷,(6)水下声学和(7)水下武器。

著录项

  • 作者

    RITTENHOUSE, ROBERT JOHN.;

  • 作者单位

    Case Western Reserve University.;

  • 授予单位 Case Western Reserve University.;
  • 学科 Information Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 298 p.
  • 总页数 298
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号