首页> 外文学位 >NATURE AND MIND IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF JOHN SCOTTUS ERIUGENA: A STUDY IN MEDIEVAL IDEALISM (MEDIEVAL, IDEALISM, PANTHEISM, THEOLOGY, ANTHROPOLOGY).
【24h】

NATURE AND MIND IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF JOHN SCOTTUS ERIUGENA: A STUDY IN MEDIEVAL IDEALISM (MEDIEVAL, IDEALISM, PANTHEISM, THEOLOGY, ANTHROPOLOGY).

机译:约翰·斯科特斯·埃里乌尼加(JOHN SCOTTUS ERIUGENA)哲学的性质与思想:中世纪理想主义(中世纪,理想主义,泛神论,神学,人类学)的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis is a study of the philosophical system of a little-studied, but important medieval thinker, John Scottus Eriugena (c. 800-870 A.D.), concentrating on his Periphyseon (De Divisione Naturae).;Against some recent commentators, I argue that Eriugena should not be interpreted solely from within the framework of the Latin-Augustinian metaphysical tradition of the early Middle Ages, that it was his sympathy for Greek Christian Neoplatonism which led him to develop an idealist philosophical outlook (Chapter Two). Eriugena synthesises the Greek Eastern and the Latin Western traditions into a profound and original philosophical system.;I show further that Eriugena "deconstructs" Latin metaphysical realism in favour of his own "me-ontology" or "meta-ontology," inspired by the Greeks. He produces the most detailed account of non-being between Plato's Parmenides and the phenomenologies of nothingness of Heidegger and Sartre.;The summit of Eriugena's system is infinite Non-being, or infinite self-identical subjectivity. This philosophy bears strong similarities to post-Kantian critical philosophy, especially the Idealism of Fichte, Schelling and Hegel. My interpretation thus agrees with the nineteenth-century Idealist reading of Eriugena. At the same time, it suggests the implications of Eriugena's idealism for the interpretation of certain modern philosophies.;I argue that Eriugena's system of nature must be approached through an investigation of his epistemology and general philosophy of mind. Instead of beginning with his fourfold classification of Nature, as most commentators have done, I begin with Eriugena's concept of the mind and its dialectical operations (Chapter Three), and continue with an examination of his anthropology (Chapter Four), and his concept of self-knowledge (Chapter Five), before turning to his relativist ontology of being and non-being (Chapter Six). Chapter Seven examines Eriugena's fourfold division of Nature in the light of the earlier chapters.
机译:这篇论文是对一个研究不足但很重要的中世纪思想家约翰·史考特斯·埃里格纳(John Scottus Eriugena,约公元800-870年)的哲学体系的研究,他的研究重点是他的Periphyseon(De Divisione Naturae)。不应仅仅从中世纪早期的拉丁-奥古斯丁形而上学传统的框架来解释埃里格纳,正是他对希腊基督教新柏拉图主义的同情促使他发展了唯心主义的哲学观(第二章)。 Eriugena将希腊东方和拉丁西方传统综合为一个深刻而原始的哲学体系。我进一步表明,Eriugena在“解构”拉丁形而上学的现实主义的基础上,偏爱他自己的“我本体论”或“元本体论”,而后者受到了希腊人。他对柏拉图的帕门尼德斯与海德格尔和萨特的虚无现象之间的非存在作了最详尽的解释。埃里格纳体系的巅峰是无限的非存在,或无限的自我认同主观性。这种哲学与后康德时期的批判哲学有很强的相似性,尤其是费希特,谢林和黑格尔的唯心主义。因此,我的解释与19世纪对Eriugena的唯心主义解读相吻合。同时,它暗示了埃里格纳的唯心主义对某些现代哲学的解释。;我认为,埃里格纳的自然系统必须通过对他的认识论和一般心智哲学的研究来实现。与其像大多数评论家所做的那样,没有从他对自然的四重分类开始,而是从埃里格纳的思想观念和其辩证法操作(第三章)开始,然后继续研究他的人类学(第四章)以及他的人类学概念。自我知识(第五章),然后转向他的相对论本体论存在与非存在(第六章)。第七章根据前几章探讨了埃里格纳对自然的四重划分。

著录项

  • 作者

    MORAN, DERMOT BRENDAN.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 413 p.
  • 总页数 413
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号