首页> 外文学位 >SEAPOWER IN THE NUCLEAR AGE: NATO AS A MARITIME ALLIANCE (EUROPE, NAVIES).
【24h】

SEAPOWER IN THE NUCLEAR AGE: NATO AS A MARITIME ALLIANCE (EUROPE, NAVIES).

机译:核时代的先驱:北约作为海上联盟(欧洲,海军)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, (NATO), from the perspective of its collective maritime forces; how those forces were organized, what tasks they were given and how they related to the broader strategic and political doctrines of the Alliance. Drawing upon much heretofore classified material, the study begins with a history and analysis of the 'cold war at sea'. It then examines the impact of the growth in Soviet maritime capabilities and the adoption by NATO of a strategy of flexible response upon the allied posture at sea. A single chapter is devoted to the reinforcement sealift problem. The concluding chapter discusses NATO and the war at sea in the early 1980s.;The study comes to the following basic conclusions. First, the collective maritime forces of the Alliance, both nuclear and conventional, have had as their tasks the traditional task which all maritime forces have had in the past; to exploit the strategic value of the seas for the purposes of conveyance and projection and to deny these usages to the enemy. Second, the NATO's maritime posture has been consistent with the overall strategies of the Alliance. Third, that the strategy of flexible response only increased NATO's need to exploit that strategic value of the seas, but did so at a time when the Soviets were becoming increasingly able to deny NATO effective use of the sea to support its position on the European continent. As history and as strategic analysis, the study shows NATO to be one of the great maritime alliances and the most significant example of the role of seapower in the nuclear age.
机译:这项研究从其集体海上力量的角度考察了北大西洋公约组织(北约)。这些部队的组织方式,任务分配以及与联盟更广泛的战略和政治学说之间的关系。该研究利用迄今已分类的资料,从对“海上冷战”的历史和分析开始。然后,研究了苏联海上能力的增长以及北约对盟军海上姿态采取灵活反应策略的影响。仅一章专门讨论加固海上运输问题。最后一章讨论了北约与1980年代初的海上战争。该研究得出以下基本结论。首先,该联盟的核海上和常规海上部队以过去所有海上部队的传统任务为任务;为了运输和投射而利用海洋的战略价值,并拒绝将这些用途带给敌人。第二,北约的海上态势与联盟的总体战略相一致。第三,灵活应对战略只会增加北约利用海洋战略价值的需要,而在苏联越来越有能力否认北约有效利用海洋来支持其在欧洲大陆上的地位之时。作为历史和战略分析,该研究表明北约是伟大的海上联盟之一,也是核能时代海上力量作用的最重要例子。

著录项

  • 作者

    SOKOLSKY, JOEL JEFFREY.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 International law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 384 p.
  • 总页数 384
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号