首页> 外文学位 >STRUCTURE AND THE POLITICAL ACTOR: AN INTERACTIVE PERSPECTIVE FOR IDEOLOGY AND ECONOMY IN FOUR MILITARY REGIMES (BRAZIL, CHILE, INDONESIA, THAILAND).
【24h】

STRUCTURE AND THE POLITICAL ACTOR: AN INTERACTIVE PERSPECTIVE FOR IDEOLOGY AND ECONOMY IN FOUR MILITARY REGIMES (BRAZIL, CHILE, INDONESIA, THAILAND).

机译:结构和政治因素:对四个军种(巴西,智利,印度尼西亚,泰国)的思想和经济的互动视角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In an attempt to understand why the military tends to commit a coup in reaction to the rise of leftist popular forces, and why the military officers in the post-coup period are inclined to implement politico-economic policies which most benefit the business elite at the expense of the economically underprivileged classes, this study proposed the Interactive Model.;Regarding the officer corps as the prime political actor, the Interactive Model claims that the officers' political will, ideology, and commitment to their corporate interests play the most decisive role in bringing about radical political change like coup and the post-coup regime transformations. In the meantime, structural factors, such as political disorder, deteriorating class conflicts, and belief in economic rationality, are believed to indirectly influence the political actor. Four countries, Brazil, Chile, Indonesia, and Thailand, were comparatively studied in this study.;As coup-maker, officers are found to have violently reacted to the rise of the Left primarily because leftist forces posed a threat to their corporate interests. In the post-coup period, officers in power, as the state-manager, usually sided with the dominant economic powers, but tension often arises between the two. This study argues that these conflicting phenomena need to be understood with reference to the state-manager's ideology and political interest.;This model critically examines the explanatory effectiveness of the structuralist approach, such as the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian model and Middle-Class Coup (or, Veto-Coup) hypothesis, in solving the above mentioned questions, but does not underrate its theoretical usefulness. In this study, which is primarily based on the voluntaristic approach focusing on the creative role of political actor, a synthetical framework of analysis is introduced.
机译:为了试图理解为什么军队倾向于对左翼民众力量的崛起做出政变,以及为什么在政变后的军官倾向于实施对最有利于商界精英的政治经济政策。为了降低经济上处于不利地位的阶级的利益,本研究提出了互动模型。关于军官作为主要的政治角色,互动模型声称军官的政治意愿,意识形态和对公司利益的承诺在其中起着决定性的作用。带来政变和政​​变后政权转型之类的重大政治变革。同时,人们认为,政治混乱,恶化的阶级冲突和对经济合理性的信仰等结构性因素会间接影响政治参与者。在此研究中,对四个国家(巴西,智利,印度尼西亚和泰国)进行了比较研究。;作为政变制定者,军官对左派的崛起做出了强烈反应,主要是因为左翼势力对其左派利益构成了威胁。在政变后时期,执政官通常是国家经济的主力军,但两者之间常常会产生紧张关系。这项研究认为,必须参照国家经理的意识形态和政治利益来理解这些矛盾现象;该模型批判性地检验了结构主义方法的解释有效性,例如官僚威权主义模型和中产阶级政变(或(Veto-Coup)假设,在解决上述问题时,但并未低估其理论实用性。在这项主要基于自愿主义方法的研究中,该研究关注政治角色的创造性作用,并引入了一个综合分析框架。

著录项

  • 作者

    SUH, BYUNG-HOON.;

  • 作者单位

    Rice University.;

  • 授予单位 Rice University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1987
  • 页码 308 p.
  • 总页数 308
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号