首页> 外文学位 >Congress versus president on foreign policy: A case study of Taiwan Relations Act.
【24h】

Congress versus president on foreign policy: A case study of Taiwan Relations Act.

机译:国会与总统在外交政策上的关系:以《台湾关系法》为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There was simply not enough political input in the process that led to the final agreement. The normalization agreement was criticized by Congressional liberals and conservatives alike. There was no mention of the security of Taiwan in the agreement. The Administration was accused of accepting all three demands of the PRC without gaining significant benefits in return. Furthermore, the Administration failed to consult Congress at the last stage of negotiations, which touched the nerve of Congressional prerogatives in foreign policy-making.; On January 29, 1979, the Administration submitted its omnibus bill to provide the legal basis on which to conduct the future relationship between the United States and Taiwan. As expected, the bill was bombarded heavily on Capitol Hill.; The foreign affairs committees of both houses conducted extensive hearings in the first half of February. Numerous witnesses were invited to testify. In the interim, Senators Church and Javits worked out security language which would express the United States concern about the peaceful future of Taiwan and guarantee continuous U.S. defensive arms sales to Taiwan. The language was carefully drafted in order not to contradict the normalization agreement and thus lead to a Presidential veto of the bill. Meanwhile, the House Foreign Affairs committee under the leadership of Zablocki submitted a clean bill to replace the omnibus legislation.; During the House floor debate, several attempts which might have unraveled normalization were defeated. A similar situation also occurred on the Senate floor. Yet, the security provisions were included in both Houses' versions. There were also other improvements such as protecting the continuation of important bilateral trade relations. Finally, the bill was passed overwhelmingly by both chambers.; The Conference Committee took only two sessions to reconcile differences between the House and Senate bills. Conferees exercised discretion to find feasible solutions which would fit the national interest of the United States and its moral responsibility toward Taiwan. The Taiwan Relations Act undoubtedly strengthened the Administration's new China policy and compensated for the deficiencies of President Carter's normalization agreement. Thus, bilateral relations between Taiwan and the U.S. have continued to prosper, and the Congress deserves a good deal of credit.
机译:在达成最终协议的过程中,根本就没有足够的政治投入。标准化协议遭到了国会自由派和保守派的批评。协议中没有提到台湾的安全。政府被指控在没有获得可观收益的情况下接受了中国的所有三项要求。此外,政府在谈判的最后阶段未能与国会协商,这触动了国会在外交决策中特权的神经。 1979年1月29日,美国政府提交了总括法案,为在美国与台湾之间建立未来关系提供了法律依据。不出所料,该法案在国会山遭到重创。两院外交事务委员会在2月上半月举行了广泛的听证会。邀请了许多证人作证。在此期间,参议员教堂和贾维茨参议员制定了安全用语,以表达美国对台湾和平未来的关切,并保证美国向台湾持续出售防御性武器。措词经过精心起草,以免与标准化协议相抵触,从而导致该法案获得总统否决权。同时,在扎布罗基(Zablocki)领导下的众议院外交事务委员会提交了一项干净的法案,以取代综合立法。在众议院辩论期间,击败了可能无法正常化的几次尝试。参议院也发生了类似情况。但是,这两个议院的版本中都包含了安全性规定。还有其他改进,例如保护重要的双边贸易关系的继续。最终,两个议院以压倒性多数通过了该法案。大会委员会只举行了两次会议,以解决众议院和参议院法案之间的分歧。参会人员行使酌处权,以寻求符合美国国家利益及其对台湾的道德责任的可行解决方案。 《台湾关系法》无疑加强了政府的新中国政策,并弥补了卡特总统的正常化协议的缺陷。因此,台湾与美国之间的双边关系继续繁荣,国会值得给予许多赞誉。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee, David Tawei.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1987
  • 页码 441 p.
  • 总页数 441
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号