首页> 外文学位 >The significance of the structure of government spending in macroeconomic models.
【24h】

The significance of the structure of government spending in macroeconomic models.

机译:政府支出结构在宏观经济模型中的重要性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis has been prompted by two major concerns, a rising trend of unemployment and the need to specify a macroeconomic model capturing economic structure, that can generate effective policy recommendations. Economic structure, which influences the allocation of resources, was taken to mean the essential characteristics and complexities of the private sector and of markets as well as the pattern of government policies and programs that affect these characteristics and complexities.;We suggest that it is analytically misleading to model government spending as a single entity. Consequently, we decomposed it into supply-enchancing expenditures, transfer payments and military spending. We also think that not only expected real wages but also non-market factors and institutional constraints and arrangements affect the determination of the labor supply. These elements can be affected by government policy. This indicates that fiscal policy extends much beyond the narrow concept to deficits and surpluses.;Five interrelated hypotheses were advanced within the framework of our theoretical perspective. These are: (1) the structure of government spending is important; (2) economic structure is significant; (3) the nature of a modern monetary economy is important; (4) the way newly created money is utilized makes a difference; and (5) the coordination of monetary and fiscal policies is significant.;Two empirical methodologies were used to test our hypotheses. First, historical analysis which involves the examination of quantitative and qualitative data in one or more economies over a particular analytical and historical horizon. Utilizing this empirical methodology three extended case studies, Meiji Japan 1868-1912, Cyprus 1974-1984, and post-1960 USA were examined. In all three cases, we found supporting evidence for our hypotheses. Second, conventional econometric techniques were utilized to test the significance of the structure of government spending, using data from the USA economy for the period 1948-1985. Our econometric results confirmed this hypothesis.;For future research government spending may be disaggregated even more. Furthermore, similar theoretical and empirical studies may be also undertaken in various countries for different time periods. Evidence from cross-cultural and cross-institutional settings may enhance our grasp of fundamentals.
机译:提出这一观点的原因主要有两个方面,即失业率的上升趋势,以及需要制定一种能反映有效经济结构的宏观经济模型的建议,以产生有效的政策建议。影响资源分配的经济结构被认为是指私营部门和市场的基本特征和复杂性,以及影响这些特征和复杂性的政府政策和计划的模式。误导性地将政府支出建模为一个整体。因此,我们将其分解为供应保证支出,转移支付和军事支出。我们还认为,不仅预期的实际工资,而且非市场因素以及制度约束和安排都会影响劳动力供应的确定。这些因素可能会受到政府政策的影响。这表明财政政策已从狭义的概念扩展到了赤字和盈余。;在我们的理论视角框架内提出了五个相互关联的假设。它们是:(1)政府支出的结构很重要; (2)经济结构显着; (3)现代货币经济的性质很重要; (4)新创造的货币使用方式有所不同; (5)货币政策与财政政策的协调性很重要。两种经验方法被用来检验我们的假设。首先,历史分析涉及在特定分析和历史视野内检查一个或多个经济体中的定量和定性数据。利用这种经验方法,研究了三个扩展的案例研究,即明治日本1868-1912,塞浦路斯1974-1984和1960年后美国。在所有这三种情况下,我们都找到了支持我们假设的证据。第二,利用来自1948-1985年美国经济的数据,传统的计量经济学技术被用来检验政府支出结构的重要性。我们的计量经济学结果证实了这一假设。对于未来的研究,政府支出可能会进一步细分。此外,在不同国家,不同时期也可能进行类似的理论和实证研究。来自跨文化和跨机构环境的证据可能会增强我们对基本原理的掌握。

著录项

  • 作者

    Theophanous, Andreas.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1988
  • 页码 291 p.
  • 总页数 291
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号