首页> 外文学位 >Science as a second language: Analysis of Emergent Bilinguals performance and the impact of English language proficiency and first language characteristics on the Colorado measures of academic success for science.
【24h】

Science as a second language: Analysis of Emergent Bilinguals performance and the impact of English language proficiency and first language characteristics on the Colorado measures of academic success for science.

机译:科学作为第二语言:分析紧急情况下的双语人员的表现以及英语水平和第一语言特征对科罗拉多科学界学术成就的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In an age when communication is highly important and states across the nation, including Colorado, have adopted Common Core State Standards, the need for academic language is even more important than ever. The language of science has been compared to a second language in that it uses specific discourse patterns, semantic rules, and a very specific vocabulary. There is a need for educators to better understand how language impacts academic achievement, specifically concerning Emergent Bilinguals (EBs). Research has identified the need to study the role language plays in content assessments and the impact they have on EBs performance (Abedi, 2008b; Abedi, Hofestter & Lord, 2004; Abedi & Lord, 2001). Since language is the means through which content knowledge is assessed, it is important to analyze this aspect of learning. A review of literature identified the need to create more reliable and valid content assessments for EBs (Abedi, 2008b) and to further study the impact of English proficiency on EBs performance on standardized assessments (Solorzano, 2008; Wolf, & Leon, 2009). This study contributes to the literature by analyzing EBs performance on a state-level science content assessment, taking into consideration English language proficiency, receptive versus productive elements of language, and students' home language. This study further contributes by discussing the relationship between language proficiency, and the different strands of science (physical, life, and earth) on the state science assessment. Finally, this study demonstrates that home language, English language proficiency, and receptive and productive elements of language are predictive of EBs' achievement on the CMAS for science, overall and by strand. It is the blending of the social (listening and speaking) with the academic (reading and writing) that is also important and possibly more important.
机译:在沟通非常重要且包括科罗拉多州在内的美国各州都采用了通用核心州标准的时代,对学术语言的需求比以往任何时候都更加重要。科学语言已与第二语言进行了比较,因为它使用了特定的话语模式,语义规则和非常特定的词汇。教育工作者需要更好地理解语言如何影响学术成就,尤其是有关紧急双语者(EB)的知识。研究已经确定需要研究语言在内容评估中的作用及其对EB绩效的影响(Abedi,2008b; Abedi,Hofestter和Lord,2004; Abedi和Lord,2001)。由于语言是评估内容知识的手段,因此分析学习的这一方面很重要。文献综述确定了需要为EB创建更可靠和有效的内容评估(Abedi,2008b),并进一步研究英语水平对EB绩效对标准化评估的影响(Solorzano,2008; Wolf,&Leon,2009)。这项研究通过在国家水平的科学内容评估中分析EB的表现,并考虑了英语水平,语言的接受能力与生产能力以及学生的母语,为文献做出了贡献。这项研究通过讨论语言能力与国家科学评估中不同科学领域(物理,生命和地球)之间的关系而做出了进一步贡献。最后,这项研究表明,家庭语言,英语水平以及语言的接受性和生产性元素可以预测EB在CMAS上的整体应用和科学应用成就。社会(听和说)与学术(读和写)的融合也很重要,甚至可能更重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bruno, Joanna K.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Denver.;

  • 授予单位 University of Denver.;
  • 学科 Educational evaluation.;Science education.;English as a second language.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 114 p.
  • 总页数 114
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号