首页> 外文学位 >Between nihilism and nothingness: Heidegger's 'Auseinandersetzung' with Nietzsche.
【24h】

Between nihilism and nothingness: Heidegger's 'Auseinandersetzung' with Nietzsche.

机译:在虚无主义与虚无之间:海德格尔与尼采的《 Auseinandersetzung》。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The thesis attempts to explain and defend Heidegger's interpretation of Nietzsche. Specifically, it responds to the charge that the reading is hermeneutically violent. My argument proceeds from two basic premises presented and developed in the Introduction. The first is that the confrontation (Auseinandersetzung) between Heidegger and Nietzsche--the violence itself--stems from Heidegger's attempt to come to terms with the phenomenon of contemporary nihilism, and, specifically, to distinguish between nihilism and genuine nothingness. The second is that his explicit critique of Nietzschean thought as the consummation of metaphysics--decried by critics as self-serving and reductive--is but a single dimension of this violence, like one voice in a contrapuntal composition. On this view, Heidegger's reading of Nietzsche aims neither at refutation nor at correction. Rather, it attempts to think, in concert with Nietzsche, a single matter (Sache) which is itself confrontational--the Auseinandersetzung of nihilism and nothingness.;For Heidegger, nihilism is nothingness in disguise. Its thoroughgoing negativity conceals the more original relation of nothingness to Being and human being (Dasein). At the same time, he argues that nothingness bodies forth in this deceptive form. The difference between nihilism and nothingness comes to pass, accordingly, in the advent of nihilism--an approach which itself conceals the withdrawal of nothingness. Nietzsche is decisive, in the task of thinking this subtle and complex difference--this Auseinandersetzung--both because he is the first to experience the advent of nihilism as such and because he too succumbs to it.;The body of the thesis explores the structure of this fundamental ambiguity--that uncanny distance, in Nietzschean thought, between revolutionary insight and victimization. Specifically, it reviews and evaluates Heidegger's treatment of three of Nietzsche's most basic philosophical concepts: nihilism (Chapter One), eternal recurrence (Chapters Two and Three) and will to power (Chapters Four, Five and Six). In the final chapter (Seven) I argue that, for Heidegger, Nietzsche's victimization by nihilism is itself the point of departure for a deeper experience of the difference between nihilism and nothingness, and that this experience remains crucial in responding to the challenge of contemporary nihilism.
机译:本文试图解释和捍卫海德格尔对尼采的解释。具体来说,它回应了阅读是解释性暴力的指控。我的论点来自引言中提出和发展的两个基本前提。首先是海德格尔与尼采之间的对抗(Auseinandersetzung)-暴力本身-源于海德格尔试图解决当代虚无主义现象,特别是区分虚无主义和真正的虚无。第二点是,他对尼采思想的形而上学的明确批判(批评家认为是自我服务和还原的)是对这种暴力行为的一个单一维度,就像一个对立成分中的声音一样。根据这种观点,海德格尔对尼采的阅读既不是针对反驳也不是为了纠正。相反,它试图与尼采一起思考一个本身就是对抗性的单一问题(Sache)-虚无主义和虚无的氛围。;对于海德格尔而言,虚无主义是伪装成的虚无。其彻底的否定性掩盖了虚无与存在与人之间更原始的联系(Dasein)。同时,他认为虚无以这种欺骗的形式出现。虚无主义和虚无之间的区别相应地随着虚无主义的出现而实现了,这种方法本身就隐藏了虚无的消失。尼采在思考这种微妙而复杂的差异方面具有决定性作用,这是因为他首先经历了虚无主义的到来,也因为他太屈从于虚无主义。这种基本模棱两可的结构-在尼采思想中,革命见识与受害之间有着千丝万缕的距离。具体而言,它回顾并评估了海德格尔对尼采最基本的三个哲学概念的处理:虚无主义(第一章),永恒的复发(第二章和第三章)和权力意志(第四章,第五章和第六章)。在最后一章(第七章)中,我认为,对于海德格尔来说,尼采对虚无主义的受害本身就是更深入地了解虚无主义与虚无之间差异的出发点,而这种经验对于应对当代虚无主义的挑战仍然至关重要。 。

著录项

  • 作者

    Crooks, James Robert.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1990
  • 页码 1 p.
  • 总页数 1
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号