首页> 外文学位 >Incentive and moral hazard in quality assurance, procurement management, and hierarchical control: An agency theoretical perspective
【24h】

Incentive and moral hazard in quality assurance, procurement management, and hierarchical control: An agency theoretical perspective

机译:质量保证,采购管理和层次控制中的激励和道德风险:代理机构理论的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation, hierarchical agency models are proposed to discuss the cooperative nature of departmental interdependence and the interest conflict between the principal and the agents in production environments. There are three functional areas discussed in this study: quality assurance, procurement management and production supervision. These models are established according to the expertise required in the hierarchy. It is the principal's objective to provide an appropriate incentive to reduce the moral hazard problem.;The first model considers the recent trend of the integration of quality and production responsibilities. Therefore, both quality and quantity are contracting attributes. In general, the optimally designed contracts are strictly increasing in quantity and quality produced. The worker is better off with this arrangement, not only through the increased compensation, but also through the enlarged responsibilities. The exact incentive scheme depends on the agents' risk attitudes and the quality-enhancing technology.;The second model deals with the interaction between procurement and production management. The production costs crucially depend on the materials, components and subassembly purchased by the procurement department, and on the effort expended by the production department. Linear profit-sharing and target-setting incentive schemes are adopted in this environment. The materials' quality is used to adjust the cost target for the production department. It is shown that in both first-best and second-best cases, profit-sharing compensation is always preferred to fixed salary. The agents' compensations are tied to their positions when the principal lacks a costless monitoring mechanism. Agency cost is then considered as the expected value of getting a perfect monitoring mechanism.;The third model, unlike the first two models with existing hierarchy, considers the necessity of production supervision and the payoff to establishing an expanded hierarchical structure. The principal's limited span of control and the agents' moral hazard problem explain the desirability of separating the principal from direct production supervision. It is shown that it is indeed to the principal's benefit to expand the hierarchy levels and organization size in many circumstances.
机译:本文提出了层次代理模型,讨论了部门相互依存的合作性质以及生产环境中委托人与代理人之间的利益冲突。本研究讨论了三个功能领域:质量保证,采购管理和生产监督。这些模型是根据层次结构所需的专业知识建立的。提供适当激励措施以减少道德风险问题是校长的目标。;第一个模型考虑了质量与生产责任整合的最新趋势。因此,质量和数量都是契约属性。通常,最佳设计的合同严格增加了生产的数量和质量。通过这种安排,工人不仅受益于增加的补偿,而且受益于扩大的责任,因而更加富裕。确切的激励方案取决于代理商的风险态度和质量增强技术。第二种模型涉及采购与生产管理之间的相互作用。生产成本关键取决于采购部门购买的材料,组件和组件,以及生产部门所花费的精力。在这种环境下采用线性利润分享和目标设定激励方案。材料的质量用于调整生产部门的成本目标。结果表明,无论是第一好还是第二好,利润共享薪酬始终比固定薪酬更可取。当委托人缺乏无成本的监督机制时,代理商的报酬与其职位相关。然后,将代理成本视为获得完善监督机制的期望值。第三种模型与具有现有层次结构的前两种模型不同,它考虑了生产监管的必要性以及建立扩展层次结构的收益。委托人的控制范围有限以及代理人的道德风险问题说明了将委托人与直接生产监督分开的可取性。结果表明,在许多情况下,扩展层次结构级别和组织规模确实对校长有利。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yang, Yeong-Ling.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of Florida.;
  • 学科 Business administration.;Industrial engineering.;Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1990
  • 页码 132 p.
  • 总页数 132
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号