首页> 外文学位 >Defining moments: Vicissitudes in Alexander Scriabin's twentieth-century reception.
【24h】

Defining moments: Vicissitudes in Alexander Scriabin's twentieth-century reception.

机译:定义时刻:亚历山大·斯克里亚宾(Alexander Scriabin)20世纪接待中的沧桑。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Few composers have either elicited more rapturous praise or suffered harsher denigration than Alexander Scriabin, yet no scholar has tracked fundamental shifts in his popularity. This dissertation explores the vicissitudes of his reception in Russia and the West and assesses the impact of these fluctuations on his canonic status. While Scriabin ranked as a pioneering modernist from the 1910s through the mid-1920s, over the next four decades, his music failed to find popular favor in either the Soviet Union or the West. The 1972 centenary of his birth renewed an appreciation for Scriabin in both regions, but by the 1980s, popular interest dwindled while scholarly interest continued to thrive. Ultimately, conflicting images of the composer spawned by historians, performers, and critics have left Scriabin everything but an artist of his own age. The inconstant reception his music has met with and the exceptions it has posed to accepted Isms has prevented the composer from maintaining a stable position in the Western canon.;Chapter One explores how Scriabin frustrated historians' expectations for Russian music traditions and early twentieth-century style. The composer's failure to establish a compositional school further marginalized him in the eyes of historiographers until late in the twentieth century, when cultural historians and analysts mutually recognized Scriabin as a representative of Russian symbolism. Chapters Two through Five compare two eras of critical acclaim (1915-1925 and 1960-1975) with two periods of misunderstanding or neglect (1925-1960 and 1975-2000) in order to assess the social, political, cultural, and aesthetic factors that shaped archetypes of the composer and dictated his canonic status.;Primary texts consist of Western and Soviet journals, newspaper articles, memoirs, monographs, and performance or recording reviews. Vital secondary materials include period studies, historical surveys, and scholarly essays that evaluate Scriabin's significance in twentieth-century music. This dissertation synthesizes a wealth of newly consulted and recently published sources on Scriabin and overturns several persistent myths about his reception. The appendix offers translations of seven primary source articles by Soviet authors of the 1920s-1940s.
机译:很少有作曲家比亚历山大·斯克里亚宾(Alexander Scriabin)获得更多的赞誉或遭受更严厉的贬损,但没有学者能追踪到他的受欢迎程度发生根本变化。本文探讨了他在俄罗斯和西方的接待情况的变迁,并评估了这些波动对他的典型地位的影响。从1910年代到1920年代中期,斯克里亚宾被评为先锋派现代主义者,但在接下来的四十年中,他的音乐未能在苏联或西方国家得到广泛青睐。 1972年他的诞辰一百周年,这两个地区的人们再次对Scriabin表示赞赏,但到了1980年代,大众兴趣逐渐减少,而学术兴趣却继续蓬勃发展。最终,史学家,表演者和评论家所产生的作曲家相互矛盾的影像,使斯科里亚宾只剩下了自己同龄的艺术家。他的音乐不断受到人们的欢迎,它对接受Isms的例外影响使作曲家无法在西方经典中保持稳定的地位。第一章探讨了Scriabin如何挫败历史学家对俄罗斯音乐传统和20世纪初的期望样式。这位作曲家未能建立作文学校,这在历史学家看来使他进一步处于边缘地位,直到二十世纪后期,文化史学家和分析家相互承认斯克里亚宾是俄国象征主义的代表。第二章至第五章比较了两个时代的批判性赞誉(1915-1925和1960-1975)与两个误解或疏忽时期(1925-1960和1975-2000),以便评估那些会引起社会关注的社会,政治,文化和审美因素塑造了作曲家的原型,并决定了其作曲家的地位。主要文本包括西方和苏联的期刊,报纸文章,回忆录,专着以及表演或录音评论。重要的中学材料包括时期研究,历史调查和评估Scriabin在20世纪音乐中的意义的学术论文。这篇论文综合了有关斯克里亚宾的大量新近咨询和最近发表的资料,并推翻了关于他的接待的一些持久的神话。附录提供了1920年代至1940年代苏联作家的七篇主要原始文献的译文。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ballard, Lincoln Miles.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Music.;History Russian and Soviet.;History Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 259 p.
  • 总页数 259
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号