首页> 外文学位 >Estimation of direct and indirect energy requirements for bus rapid transit (BRT) and light rail transit (LRT).
【24h】

Estimation of direct and indirect energy requirements for bus rapid transit (BRT) and light rail transit (LRT).

机译:估算公交快速公交(BRT)和轻轨公交(LRT)的直接和间接能源需求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In recent years, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) has emerged as a competitor of Light Rail Transit (LRT). There is a debate about which mode is more energy efficient. A few researchers have tried to compare BRT and LRT on the basis of direct energy consumption. To analyze energy consumption in its proper context, both direct and indirect energy need to be considered. This research was intended to fill this gap. The study first determined the energy intensities for different components of LRT and BRT. Then a life cycle energy assessment for a transit corridor in Ottawa was conducted. Several energy estimation models were developed to estimate vehicle and infrastructure energy consumption. It was found that BRT and LRT nearly consumed the same amount of energy, if a 2.5 km tunnel is considered. However, without the tunnel, LRT consumed approximately 12% more energy than BRT. The share of indirect energy was 66% of the total life cycle energy for both the systems.
机译:近年来,快速公交(BRT)成为轻轨交通(LRT)的竞争对手。关于哪种模式更节能,存在争议。一些研究人员试图根据直接能耗比较BRT和LRT。为了在适当的背景下分析能耗,需要同时考虑直接和间接能耗。这项研究旨在填补这一空白。该研究首先确定了LRT和BRT不同组件的能量强度。然后对渥太华的过境走廊进行了生命周期能量评估。开发了几种能源估算模型来估算车辆和基础设施的能耗。如果考虑2.5公里的隧道,发现BRT和LRT几乎消耗了相同的能量。但是,在没有隧道的情况下,LRT的能耗比BRT高出约12%。两种系统的间接能量份额均占其总生命周期能量的66%。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rahman, A.K.M. Mushfiqur.;

  • 作者单位

    Carleton University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Carleton University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 M.A.Sc.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 336 p.
  • 总页数 336
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号