首页> 外文学位 >Diplomacy through militancy? The 1954--1955 Chinese offshore islands crisis: A case study in Sino-American brinkmanship.
【24h】

Diplomacy through militancy? The 1954--1955 Chinese offshore islands crisis: A case study in Sino-American brinkmanship.

机译:通过好战进行外交? 1954--1955年中国近海岛屿危机:以中美边缘政策为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this dissertation was to elucidate the origins of the Sino-American confrontation in the Taiwan Straits through a case study of the 1954-55 Chinese offshore islands crisis. With an exclusive access to China's documents and interviews with Chinese generals and diplomats, the research shows that the Chinese leaders misperceived the cold war in Asia and America's purposes in the Taiwan Straits. After Korea, Beijing intended to communicate with Washington to solve the problems left behind by the war, especially the Taiwan question. Unsuccessful in diplomatic efforts, Mao decided to send a strong signal by military means--shelling the Nationalist-held islands in order to draw world attention and bring more pressure on Eisenhower.; Using newly declassified American documents, the work explores the distortion of U.S. information processing and misunderstanding of the Chinese intentions. The American leaders convinced that a full-scale attack on Jinmen, to be followed by an invasion of Taiwan, seemed imminent. They had committed to the defense of the offshore islands, including nuclear-war preparation. The incoming information was rendered equivocal when filtered through anti-communist beliefs, partisan politics, and bureaucratic system. The misinterpreted information led to egregious and fateful miscalculation, which had brought the U.S. to the brink of war with China just one year after the Korean Armistice. The following decade saw three more major crises over the same islands.; The research finds that the crisis had a natural function of politics and ideology, serving both countries' domestic goals and international interests. Among other results, the crisis became a communication channel between the two countries which did not have diplomatic relations. The offshore islands became a forum for a government-to-government contact between the two rivals in the mid-1950s. Rather than fighting simply to eliminate the Communists or invade the islands, America and China needed to keep these islands in the hands of the Nationalists for their own specific political reasons, in particular ways, and with particular consequences, sometimes unintended. The crisis politics underlay a tense Sino-American relationship in the cold war.
机译:本文的目的是通过对1954-55年中国近海岛屿危机的个案研究来阐明中美在台湾海峡对抗的起源。这项研究显示,中国领导人拥有对中国文件的独家访问权以及对中国将军和外交官的采访,表明中国领导人误以为亚洲和美国在台湾海峡的目的是对冷战的误解。在朝鲜之后,北京打算与华盛顿沟通以解决战争遗留的问题,特别是台湾问题。毛泽东在外交上没有成功,但决定通过军事手段发出强烈信号,炮击国民党控制的岛屿,以引起世界的关注并给艾森豪威尔施加更大压力。该作品使用最新解密的美国文件,探索了美国信息处理的歪曲和对中国意图的误解。美国领导人坚信,对金门的全面攻击似乎即将到来。他们承诺捍卫近海岛屿,包括准备核战争。通过反共信仰,党派政治和官僚体系过滤后,传入的信息变得模棱两可。误解的信息导致了严重而致命的错误估计,这使得朝鲜停战仅一年后,美国就与中国处于战争边缘。在随后的十年中,同一岛屿又发生了三场重大危机。研究发现,这场危机具有政治和意识形态的天然功能,符合两国的国内目标和国际利益。在其他结果中,危机成为两国之间没有外交关系的沟通渠道。 1950年代中期,离岸岛屿成为两个对手之间政府与政府接触的论坛。美中两国不仅要为消灭共产党人或侵略这些岛屿而战,还需要出于自己特定的政治原因,某些方式和后果(有时是意料之外的)将这些岛屿掌握在国民党手中。危机政治在冷战中奠定了紧张的中美关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Li, Xiao-bing.;

  • 作者单位

    Carnegie Mellon University.;

  • 授予单位 Carnegie Mellon University.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.; History United States.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 303 p.
  • 总页数 303
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界史;美洲史;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号