首页> 外文学位 >Efficacy of changing physics misconceptions held by ninth grade students at varying developmental levels through teacher addition of a prediction phase to the learning cycle.
【24h】

Efficacy of changing physics misconceptions held by ninth grade students at varying developmental levels through teacher addition of a prediction phase to the learning cycle.

机译:通过在教师的学习周期中增加一个预测阶段,可以改变九年级学生在不同发展水平上对物理错误观念的看法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the efficacy in correcting student misconceptions about science concepts by using the pedagogical method of asking students to make a prediction in science laboratory lessons for students within pre-formal, transitional, or formal stages of cognitive development. The subjects were students (n = 235) enrolled in ninth grade physical science classes (n=15) in one high school of an urban profile school district. The four freshmen physical science teachers who were part of the study routinely taught the concepts in the study as a part of the normal curriculum during the time of the school year in which the research was conducted.;Classrooms representing approximately half of the students were presented with a prediction phase at the start of each of ten learning cycle lesson. The other classrooms were not presented with a prediction phase. Students were pre and post tested using a 40 question instrument based on the Force Concept Inventory augmented with questions on the concepts taught during the period of the study. Students were also tested using the Test of Scientific Reasoning to determine their cognitive developmental level.;Results showed 182 of the students to be cognitively pre-formal, 50 to be transitional, and only 3 to be cognitively formal. There were significantly higher gains (p .05) for the formal group over the transitional group and for the transitional group over the Pre-formal group. However, there were not significantly higher gains (p > .05) for the total students having a prediction phase compared to those not having a prediction phase. Neither were there significant gains (p > .05) within the pre-formal group or within the transitional group. There were too few students within the formal group for meaningful results.
机译:这项研究通过使用要求学生在认知发展的前,过渡或正式阶段对学生进行科学实验室课程预测的教学方法,研究了纠正学生对科学概念的误解的功效。受试者是在城市概况学区的一所中学就读的九年级物理科学班(n = 15)中的学生(n = 235)。参加研究的四名新生物理科学老师在进行研究的学年期间,将研究中的概念作为常规课程的一部分进行常规教学。代表了大约一半学生的教室在每个10个学习周期课程的开始时都有一个预测阶段。其他教室没有进行预测阶段。使用基于“部队概念清单”的40道问题工具对学生进行了预测和事后测试,并在学习期间对所教概念进行了补充。还使用科学推理测验对学生进行了测验,以确定他们的认知发展水平。结果显示182名学生的认知是正式的,50名是过渡的,只有3名是正式的。与过渡组相比,正式组和过渡组的收益明显更高(p <.05)。但是,与没有预测阶段的学生相比,有预测阶段的总学生没有明显更高的收益(p> 0.05)。在预备组或过渡组中均没有明显的获益(P> 0.05)。正式小组中的学生太少,无法取得有意义的结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Oglesby, Michael L.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Missouri - Kansas City.;

  • 授予单位 University of Missouri - Kansas City.;
  • 学科 Education Pedagogy.;Education Sciences.;Physics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 183 p.
  • 总页数 183
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号