首页> 外文学位 >The scientific community and typhoid prevention: Public health and the Chicago Drainage Case, 1900-1906.
【24h】

The scientific community and typhoid prevention: Public health and the Chicago Drainage Case, 1900-1906.

机译:科学界与伤寒的预防:公共卫生和芝加哥排水案,1900-1906年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The United States Supreme Court Case, State of Missouri v. State of Illinois and the Sanitary District of Chicago, (1900-1906) provides an instructive case study of how the participation of scientists in legal struggles helped shape the direction of both municipal public health campaigns and scientific work. In assessing whether Chicago's Sanitary and Ship Canal posed a typhoid threat to the citizens of St. Louis downstream, scientists from local universities and health departments conducted extensive chemical and bacteriological studies of the Illinois and Mississippi River systems. The scientific community used this legal battle to its own advantage, to conduct funded studies of the typhoid bacillus in "natural conditions," to test standard methods of water analysis, and to define their role in public health work.;My dissertation first explores the role engineers, chemists, and bacteriologists played in public health work, focusing on typhoid fever prevention in Chicago from 1850 through the Supreme Court's decision in favor of Chicago in 1906. These anti-typhoid campaigns in Chicago reveal that typhoid prevention did not become the province of any one scientific discipline but remained an interdisciplinary endeavor into the twentieth century. Second, the dissertation examines how public health work offered an important forum for creative scientific research. At a time period in which the German ethic of pure research had crossed the Atlantic but few funded research opportunities existed in the United States, American scientists undertook public health research, often forcefully denying the existence, necessity or relevance of a dichotomy between pure and applied science. Finally, the dissertation uses the debates within the scientific community surrounding the nature of expert witnessing to investigate scientists' aspirations to present themselves as models of Progressive Era efficiency: honest, reliable men (and women) who produced rational, accurate, and useful data for society at a minimum cost.
机译:美国最高法院一案,密苏里州诉伊利诺伊州诉芝加哥卫生区案(1900-1906年),提供了一个指导性案例研究,说明科学家参与法律斗争如何帮助塑造两个市政公共卫生的方向运动和科学工作。在评估芝加哥的卫生和船舶运河是否对下游的圣路易斯市民造成伤寒威胁时,当地大学和卫生部门的科学家对伊利诺伊州和密西西比河水系进行了广泛的化学和细菌学研究。科学界利用这场法律斗争来发挥自己的优势,在“自然条件下”对伤寒杆菌进行了资助研究,以测试水质分析的标准方法,并确定其在公共卫生工作中的作用。角色工程师,化学家和细菌学家参加了公共卫生工作,他们从1850年开始通过预防最高的芝加哥1906年芝加哥裁决来预防伤寒。芝加哥的这些抗伤寒运动表明,伤寒预防并没有成为该省属于任何一门科学学科,但到20世纪仍然是跨学科的研究。其次,本文研究了公共卫生工作如何为创新科学研究提供了重要论坛。在德国纯粹研究伦理跨越大西洋但美国几乎没有资助的研究机会的时期,美国科学家进行了公共卫生研究,常常坚决否认纯粹与应用之间二分法的存在,必要性或相关性。科学。最后,本文利用科学界内部围绕专家见证性质的辩论来调查科学家的愿望,以展示自己作为进步时代效率的典范:诚实,可靠的男人(和女人)为研究提供合理,准确和有用的数据最低成本的社会。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shapiro, Carolyn G.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 History of Science.;Health Sciences Public Health.;History United States.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 430 p.
  • 总页数 430
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号