首页> 外文学位 >Transfer of dual-use technology from the United States to the USSR: The tradeoff between national security and economic benefits, or, Klitgaard's dilemma revisited in the Gorbachev era.
【24h】

Transfer of dual-use technology from the United States to the USSR: The tradeoff between national security and economic benefits, or, Klitgaard's dilemma revisited in the Gorbachev era.

机译:将双重用途技术从美国转移到苏联:国家安全与经济利益之间的权衡,或者在戈尔巴乔夫时代重新审视了克里琴高的困境。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is an inherent tradeoff among the economic benefits, political effects, and national security risks in trade relations between potential and actual adversaries. This dilemma, originally proposed by Robert Klitgaard (1974), is applied herein to U.S.-USSR relations during the Gorbachev era (1985-1991). Locating the tradeoff as applied to the Soviet Union is complicated by the additional factor of exporting potentially dual-use technology, and by the difficulties of coordinating export policy among a coalition of industrialized nations.; Cold War-era export administration legislation ignored the dilemma: under almost all circumstances, the United States considered economic benefits to be less important than political-security concerns in its relations with the Soviet Union. Gorbachev's policies orchestrated changes of such magnitude, both within and outside of the USSR, that the United States was faced with the necessity of rethinking the relationship between its security and trade policies. To date, the United States has yet to seriously consider its own economic security in terms of its partners in the multilateral export control regime (COCOM). COCOM has, since its inception, been primarily engaged in ensuring the technological security of the West against its common adversary.; The collapse of the Soviet threat has sharply highlighted the intra-COCOM differences on security: the Americans emphasize almost exclusively political concerns; the West Europeans stress economic as much as political interests. Even during the Cold War, the European allies were more inclined to trade in dual-use technology. Now they have few objections to not only continuing, but escalating, this practice.; This study expands Klitgaard's model in a dimension that it originally considers only perfunctorily: the economic competition that the United States increasingly faces from its allies. The U.S. government will henceforth have to consider evaluating the costs and benefits of each and every trade deal: the former USSR is no longer an ideological, and less of a military, threat; the COCOM partners are investing heavily in advanced technology that the ex-USSR desperately wants; and, finally, the former Soviet Union is a relatively virgin market. In sum, the United States is competing with other industrialized nations for trade advantages with an erstwhile adversary.
机译:在潜在对手与实际对手之间的贸易关系中,经济利益,政治影响和国家安全风险之间存在着内在的权衡。这种困境最初是由罗伯特·克里特高(Robert Klitgaard)(1974)提出的,在此适用于戈尔巴乔夫时代(1985-1991)期间的美苏关系。定位可能适用于苏联的权衡因素是由于可能出口双重用途技术的出口的其他因素以及在工业化国家联盟之间协调出口政策的困难而造成的。冷战时期的出口管理立法忽略了这一难题:在几乎所有情况下,美国在与苏联的关系中都认为经济利益不如政治安全问题重要。戈尔巴乔夫的政策策划了苏联内部和外部如此巨大的变化,以至于美国不得不重新考虑其安全与贸易政策之间的关系。迄今为止,美国尚未在多边出口管制制度(COCOM)的伙伴方面认真考虑自身的经济安全。自成立以来,COCOM主要致力于确保西方对抗其共同对手的技术安全。苏联威胁的瓦解已大大突显了反恐委员会内部在安全方面的分歧:美国人几乎只强调政治关切;西欧人强调经济和政治利益。即使在冷战期间,欧洲盟国也更倾向于使用双重用途技术。现在他们几乎没有反对不仅要继续这种做法,而且要逐步扩大这种做法。这项研究扩大了克里特加德模型的范围,它最初只被认为是敷衍了事:美国越来越多地从盟友那里面对经济竞争。此后,美国政府将不得不考虑评估每笔贸易协定的成本和收益:前苏联不再是意识形态的威胁,而已不再是军事威胁。 COCOM合作伙伴正大力投资前苏联急切想要的先进技术;最后,前苏联是一个相对处女的市场。总而言之,美国正在与其他工业化国家争夺贸易优势,而对手却是曾经的对手。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 405 p.
  • 总页数 405
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;国际法;经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号