首页> 外文学位 >A comparative study on the effectiveness of group decision support systems in the disaster management domain.
【24h】

A comparative study on the effectiveness of group decision support systems in the disaster management domain.

机译:灾害管理领域中群体决策支持系统有效性的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The disaster response efforts by multiple organizations during catastrophic events such as the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, Hurricane Hugo, Hurricane Andrew and California's Loma Prieta earthquake have demonstrated problems with agencies' coordination efforts that resulted in an inadequate response. Therefore, to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of disaster relief efforts, organizations must start considering alternatives methods for disaster preparedness and planning.A key to effective planning is the ability to extract and integrate the opinions of multiple experts. This study focused on expert groups engaged in disaster planning. The study was aimed at comparing groups using Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS), one of the proposed methods to enhance disaster planning, with non-GDSS (human facilitator) group, and a baseline group which has no support. Subjects in this study were from the American Red Cross, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the Marine Spill Response cooperation. Participants were given disaster scenarios and were asked to evaluate the events and make recommendations to make response and relief efforts successful.The planning process and outcomes were measured among the three different groups. The planning process measurements included consensus, commitment, anonymity, and satisfaction. The planning outcomes, on the other hand, consisted of the number of comments generated by each group. Major findings of this study show that there was no difference between the GDSS and non-GDSS groups in the number of comments generated and level of consensus. In addition, the anonymity feature did not aid the GDSS groups to generate more comments. However, GDSS groups were more comfortable using the anonymity factor in their meetings, indicating a potential for more open and honest comments. Both GDSS and non-GDSS groups outperformed the baseline group in the area of comments generated.Based upon the findings from this study, it is recommended that organizations in the disaster management domain introduce a facilitator and structure to their preparedness process and planning meetings. This structuring of the planning process could be carried out using technology such as Group Decision Support Systems or with a human facilitator either method will enhance disaster management and planning.
机译:多个组织在诸如埃克森·瓦尔迪兹溢油,飓风雨果,安德鲁飓风和加利福尼亚州的洛马普里塔地震等灾难性事件中的灾难响应努力表明,各机构的协调工作存在问题,导致响应不足。因此,为了使救灾工作的效率和有效性最大化,组织必须开始考虑备灾和计划的替代方法。有效计划的关键是能够提取和整合多个专家的意见。这项研究的重点是从事灾难规划的专家组。这项研究的目的是将使用团体决策支持系统(GDSS)的小组与非GDSS(人类协助者)小组和不支持的基线小组进行比较,该小组决策提议的系统是增强灾害计划的一种建议方法。这项研究的受试者来自美国红十字会,美国海岸警卫队和海洋溢​​油应急组织。为参加者提供了灾难情景,并要求他们评估事件并提出建议以使响应和救济工作取得成功。在三个不同组之间对计划过程和结果进行了衡量。计划过程的度量包括共识,承诺,匿名性和满意度。另一方面,计划结果包括每个小组生成的评论数量。这项研究的主要发现表明,GDSS组和非GDSS组在产生的评论数量和共识水平上没有差异。此外,匿名功能并没有帮助GDSS组生成更多评论。但是,GDSS小组在会议中使用匿名因素更为自在,这表明有可能发表更开放和诚实的评论。在生成的评论方面,GDSS和非GDSS小组均优于基准小组。基于本研究的结果,建议灾难管理领域的组织在其准备过程和计划会议中引入促进者和结构。可以使用诸如组决策支持系统之类的技术或借助人工协助者来执行计划过程的结构,这两种方法都可以增强灾难管理和计划能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alharthi, Hanna Mohammed.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Engineering System Science.Operations Research.Computer Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 165 p.
  • 总页数 165
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号