首页> 外文学位 >Development of a framework for road cost allocation and road pricing in Uganda.
【24h】

Development of a framework for road cost allocation and road pricing in Uganda.

机译:在乌干达开发道路成本分配和道路定价框架。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Highway financing has become a major concern in most countries. Highway construction and maintenance is an expensive undertaking and yet governments all over the world are faced with budgetary constraints, characterized by huge deficits. As a result, road pricing has become a common practice, not only as a means of recovering road costs, but also as a method of rationalizing the use of highway facilities.; Road pricing presents even greater difficulties to the developing countries, due to a number of factors. Firstly, because of capital shortage, developing countries rely very heavily on external borrowing to raise highway finance. In most cases the leading financial institution is the World Bank, which now requires its borrowers to address the issue of road pricing. Secondly, road user charges, such as import duty and sales tax on transport inputs (petroleum, vehicles, tyres and spare parts) contribute substantially to government revenue, in developing, countries. Thirdly, in most developing countries, no suitable framework has been developed for estimation and allocation of road costs to different vehicle classes.; In this study a framework has been developed for estimating and allocating Uganda's road costs. The extent to which the current level of road user charges recover road costs was estimated. In addition, the possible impact of marginal cost pricing on cost recovery and government revenue in Uganda has been evaluated.; The findings of the study indicate that the current user charges recover estimated road costs by a factor of 1.07. The present user charges are biased in favour of heavier vehicles, and yet these vehicles do more damage to the pavement. If adopted, marginal cost pricing would recover only 43% of the estimated road costs, would reduce road user revenues by 60% and result in a loss in total government revenue of about 27%. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:公路融资已成为大多数国家的主要关切。公路建设和维护是一项昂贵的工作,然而,世界各地的政府都面临着预算赤字的问题,其特点是赤字巨大。结果,道路定价已成为一种普遍做法,不仅是收回道路成本的手段,而且是合理利用高速公路设施的一种方法。由于许多因素,道路定价给发展中国家带来了更大的困难。首先,由于资本短缺,发展中国家非常依赖外部借款来筹集公路资金。在大多数情况下,领先的金融机构是世界银行,世界银行现在要求其借款人解决道路定价问题。其次,道路使用者的费用,例如进口税和运输投入品(石油,车辆,轮胎和零件)的销售税,在发展中国家增加了政府的收入。第三,在大多数发展中国家,尚未开发出合适的框架来估算和分配不同车辆类别的道路成本。在这项研究中,开发了一个框架来估算和分配乌干达的公路成本。估算了当前道路使用者收费水平可收回道路成本的程度。此外,已经评估了边际成本定价对乌干达成本回收和政府收入的可能影响。该研究的结果表明,当前的用户费用可以将估算的道路成本收回1.07倍。当前的用户收费偏向于较重的车辆,但是这些车辆对人行道造成了更大的损害。如果采用的话,边际成本定价将只能收回估计的道路成本的43%,将道路使用者的收入减少60%,并导致政府总收入损失约27%。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Onyango-Matata, Godfrey.;

  • 作者单位

    University of New Brunswick (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of New Brunswick (Canada).;
  • 学科 Economics Finance.; Engineering Civil.; Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 M.Sc.Eng.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 180 p.
  • 总页数 180
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财政、金融;建筑科学;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号