首页> 外文学位 >Middle school library catalog access: A comparison between electronic and manual catalog systems.
【24h】

Middle school library catalog access: A comparison between electronic and manual catalog systems.

机译:中学图书馆目录访问:电子目录系统和手动目录系统之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study compares the use of a computerized library catalog system in a middle school with the use of a card file catalog system. The study analyzed 734 survey responses from students in English classes at a middle school which emphasizes language and technology and at which the computer catalog system is in its first year of operation. The study examines the dependent variables of average time spent per instance of catalog search, the student's self-described level of satisfaction with the search, and the frequency with which books were checked out following the search. The independent variable was type of catalog searched (card file catalog, library terminal of computer catalog, and classroom terminal of computer catalog) with controlling variables of grade (sixth, seventh, and eighth), academic level (standard and accelerated), and region of student's origination (local to the district and applicant from outside the district). An alpha level of.05 was used for all statistical tests.Using an ANOVA, no difference in average search time was found across catalog types, although sixth grade students searched longer than seventh or eighth grade students (p A chi square analysis found no correlation in user perceived satisfaction across catalog types. Sixth graders were less satisfied with library terminal searches (p A chi square analysis found that classroom computer searches did correlate with fewer instances of books being checked out (p The study concludes with recommendations for follow up action and further study.
机译:这项研究将一所中学的计算机图书馆目录系统与一卡通卡片目录系统的使用进行了比较。该研究分析了一所中学的734名来自英语班学生的调查反馈,该调查强调语言和技术,并且计算机目录系统在其运行的第一年就在该目录中进行。该研究调查了每个目录搜索所花费的平均时间,学生对搜索的自我描述的满意程度以及搜索后检出书本的频率的因变量。自变量是搜索类别的类型(卡文件目录,计算机目录的图书馆终端和计算机目录的教室终端),其控制变量包括年级(第六,第七和第八),学术水平(标准和加速)和地区学生的出身证明(本地区本地人和本地区以外的申请人)。所有统计检验均使用0.05的alpha值。使用方差分析,尽管六年级学生的搜索时间长于七年级或八年级学生,但各类别的平均搜索时间没有差异(p卡方分析发现没有相关性六年级学生对图书馆终端搜索的满意度不高(p卡方分析发现,教室计算机搜索确实与被检出的图书实例较少相关(p研究得出结论,建议采取后续行动,进一步研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Troxel, Steven Richard.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Library Science.Education Secondary.Education Technology of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 110 p.
  • 总页数 110
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号