首页> 外文学位 >Political innovation and political survival: Coalition politics, free democrats, and Germany's centrist foreign policy, 1969-1990.
【24h】

Political innovation and political survival: Coalition politics, free democrats, and Germany's centrist foreign policy, 1969-1990.

机译:政治创新和政治生存:1969-1990年的联合政治,自由民主党和德国的中间派外交政策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The political dynamics of multiparty governments are traditionally associated with generating governmental instability, ideological polarization, and political weakness, resulting in foreign policy incoherence and paralysis. Why then did successive German governments promote a coherently reformist and activist foreign policy agenda? Most observers explain the moderate and multilateral tone of German foreign policy with systemic pressures or public opinion. This study accounts for the foreign policy effect of coalition politics.;The research design was inspired by Robert Putnam's "two-level games" approach and Wolfram Hanrieder's "compatibility and consensus" concept. Concentrating on the years between 1969 and 1990, the study investigates three aspects of German foreign policy: The consistency with which German coalition governments pursued foreign policy goals; their commitment to international cooperation and multilateralism; and the effects of coalition politics on Germany's international bargaining position. The investigation is limited to historical instances that fulfill two conditions: (1) Polarization of the domestic debate on foreign policy issues; and (2) paralysis in Germany's decision-making process.;The study finds that the dynamics of German coalition politics had several effects: First, they supported a cooperative and multilateral pursuit of foreign policy goals. Second, they assisted the two main parties (SPD and CDU/CSU) in adjusting to the exigencies of the densely interdependent environment within which German foreign policy has to be conducted. Third, they helped to moderated foreign policy extremism voiced within the SPD and CDU/CSU. Fourth, if a "third" party aspired to gain and maintain a power-political position as a junior coalition party, it had to successfully pursue both political centrism and pragmatism.;Taken together these points suggest that the dynamics of coalition politics may equip a political system with both enhanced international bargaining power and the ability to pursue a reformist and activist foreign policy. This finding is counter-intuitive and discredits the thesis that multiparty government must lead to paralysis and indecision.
机译:传统上,多党政府的政治动力与造成政府不稳定,意识形态两极化和政治弱点有关,从而导致外交政策的不连贯和瘫痪。为什么随后的历届德国政府都提倡连贯的改良主义和激进主义外交政策议程?大多数观察者用系统性压力或舆论解释德国外交政策的温和和多边基调。该研究解释了联合政治的外交政策效果。该研究设计的灵感来自罗伯特·普特南(Robert Putnam)的“两层博弈”方法和沃尔夫拉姆·汉里德(Wolfram Hanrieder)的“相容与共识”概念。该研究集中于1969年至1990年之间,研究了德国外交政策的三个方面:德国联合政府追求外交政策目标的一致性;他们对国际合作和多边主义的承诺;以及联合政治对德国国际谈判地位的影响。该调查仅限于满足两个条件的历史实例:(1)关于外交政策问题的国内辩论两极分化;研究发现,德国联盟政治的动态有多种影响:首先,它们支持合作和多边追求外交政策目标。第二,他们协助两个主要政党(SPD和CDU / CSU)适应了紧密相互依存的环境的紧急情况,在这种环境中必须执行德国的外交政策。第三,他们帮助缓和了社民党和基民盟/基社盟内部表达的外交政策极端主义。第四,如果一个“第三”政党渴望获得并保持其作为初级联合政党的权力政治地位,那么它就必须成功地追求政治中心主义和实用主义。这些观点加在一起表明,联合政治的动态可能会装备具有增强的国际议价能力和奉行改良主义和激进主义外交政策能力的政治体制。这一发现是违反直觉的,并且使多党政府必须导致瘫痪和犹豫不决的观点变得不正确。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hanterman, Christoph.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 630 p.
  • 总页数 630
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:26

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号