首页> 外文学位 >First philosophy and religion in the ethical thought of Levinas.
【24h】

First philosophy and religion in the ethical thought of Levinas.

机译:列维纳斯伦理思想中的第一哲学和宗教。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation focuses on the work of Emmanuel Levinas. In claiming "ethics is first philosophy," Levinas helps overcome the perceived indifference to ethical concerns among post-modern thinkers. However, it is often overlooked that this claim is as much about philosophy as it is about the importance of ethics. The dissertation explains why Levinas' philosophy turns to ethics and what philosophy is capable of once it has adopted this ethical figure.;The first section is devoted to Levinas' Totality and Infinity. There, Levinas argues that ethics reorients philosophy by accomplishing the metaphysical desire for beings as such, what Levinas calls the absolutely other. A reading of Jacques Derrida's essay "Violence and Metaphysics" shows that Totality and Infinity is profoundly determined by a theological conceptuality and correlatively by forgetting the ontological difference. This suggests that the primacy of ethics depends on an anterior instance, thus rendering Levinas' first philosophy secondary.;The second section of the dissertation positions Levinas' ethical philosophy within the tradition of phenomenological philosophy and its quest for a subject who is first or ultimate. Whereas Husserl practiced the reduction to the point where it reached consciousness, Levinas practices it to a point beyond that: responsibility. Ethics intervenes as a supplement to Husserl's phenomenology: ethics is added to phenomenology in order to explain its possibility at the same time as it replaces phenomenology with ethical descriptions. This section concludes by contesting the privilege that Levinas accords to ethics in the phenomenology of the subject. It does so by showing that Heidegger's Dasein analytic offers phenomenological philosophy a similar subject.;The third section argues that in responsibility, phenomena appear which do not appear when the subject is consciousness. These include religious phenomena. The phenomenology of responsibility can thus be the basis for a philosophy of religion. Like the modern philosophy of religion figured in Hegel and Nietzsche, it articulates the rationality or significance of religious phenomena without recourse to the dogmatic authority of faith or historical tradition. However, a philosophy of religion issued from Levinas surpasses the origin of this tradition in the death of God and end of metaphysics.
机译:论文的重点是伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯的工作。在宣称“道德是第一哲学”时,列维纳斯帮助克服了后现代思想家对道德关注的冷漠。但是,人们常常忽略了这一主张,它既关乎哲学又关乎道德的重要性。论文解释了列维纳斯的哲学为何转向伦理学,以及哲学一旦采纳了这个道德形象,其能力是什么。第一部分论述了列维纳斯的全面性和无限性。在这里,列维纳斯认为,伦理学通过实现对存在者的形而上学的渴望来重新定位哲学,列维纳斯称之为绝对的另一种。对雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)的文章《暴力与形而上学》的阅读显示,全面性和无限性是由神学概念深刻地决定的,而忘记了本体论上的差异则是相关的。这表明伦理学的首要性取决于一个先例,从而使列维纳斯的第一哲学处于次要地位。论文的第二部分将列维纳斯的伦理哲学置于现象学哲学的传统之内,并寻求其至高无上的主题。 。胡塞尔将还原实践到达到意识的程度,而列维纳斯将还原实践到了超越这一点的地方:责任。伦理学作为对胡塞尔现象学的补充:伦理学被添加到现象学中,以便在用伦理学描述代替现象学的同时解释其可能性。本节的最后是争辩列维纳斯在主题现象学上赋予伦理学的特权。它通过证明海德格尔的达斯丁分析为现象学哲学提供了类似的主题而做到了这一点。第三部分认为,在责任感中,出现了当主题是意识时才不会出现的现象。这些包括宗教现象。因此,责任现象学可以成为宗教哲学的基础。就像黑格尔和尼采所提出的现代宗教哲学一样,它阐明了宗教现象的合理性或重要性,而不求助于信仰或历史传统的教条权威。但是,列维纳斯(Levinas)提出的宗教哲学在上帝的去世和形而上学的终结中超越了这一传统的起源。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kosky, Jeffrey L.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Religion Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 386 p.
  • 总页数 386
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号