首页> 外文学位 >'Our poet the Monarch': Sir Philip Sidney and Renaissance subjectivity.
【24h】

'Our poet the Monarch': Sir Philip Sidney and Renaissance subjectivity.

机译:“我们的诗人君主”:菲利普·西德尼爵士和文艺复兴时期的主体性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes Renaissance process of self-authorization and uses Sir Philip Sidney as its literary model. It examines how Sir Philip Sidney contests a governance not situated in the self as it attempts to understand how the concept of governance is integrated into private concepts of love and duty. Sidney's body of work focuses on to whom or to what is one's fundamental allegiance--the Queen, the state, or the self. His writings encourage a conception of the self as one's own sovereign, i.e., as one's own master. To be one's own master is to assume responsibility for one's actions rather than to accept the presumed responsibility of one's employer, one's master. At the base of this self-sovereignty is the belief that right judgment resides within the individual--be he poet, subject, or monarch. Thus the individual is conceptually akin to the monarch because of a shared interest in the preservation and development of the state. Correspondingly, the sovereign is as likely as the subject--the individual--to have a vision of the state that deserves consideration and perhaps implementation. Self-sovereignty effectively "restores" subjectivity to the subject who no longer recognizes conceptually the sovereign's position as that of an absolute better but rather as one of a number of negotiated and protean positions. Sidney's writing centers on "mastery" and the construction of a "citizen" subject as an autonomous player in the representation and shaping of the self and the state. Yet an "empowered" citizenry introduces a level of instability that unnerves governments. Early governments assume that monarchical and tyrannical governments present a valuable stabilizing force, based on the belief that rule by a single, consistent will disallows fractiousness. However, even Sidney acknowledges that a single, consistent will is the stuff of fiction and that a state with consistent, equally implemented laws can counter instability to a great extent. Sidney's work spurs an idea of the self that allows the redefinition of the subject as one's own sovereign. As his writing anatomizes the work of self-constitution, it shows the way toward that citizen subject that Milton needed and Hobbes feared.
机译:本文分析了文艺复兴时期的自我授权过程,并以菲利普·西德尼爵士为文学模型。它研究了菲利普·西德尼爵士如何质疑不存在于自我中的治理,因为它试图理解治理的概念如何融入到爱与责任的私人概念中。悉尼的工作重点是对谁或对谁的基本效忠-女王,国家或自我。他的著作鼓励人们将自我理解为自己的主权,即作为自己的主人。成为自己的主人,是对自己的行为承担责任,而不是承担雇主,主人的推定责任。这种自我主权的基础是一种信念,即正确的判断存在于个人之中,无论他是诗人,臣民还是君主。因此,由于在维护和发展国家方面有共同的利益,因此个人在概念上类似于君主。相应地,主权者与主体(个人)一样,对国家的愿景也应予以考虑甚至实施。自我主权有效地“恢复了”主体的主观性,该主体不再从概念上将主权立场视为绝对更好的立场,而是许多协商和千变万化的立场之一。 Sidney的写作主要围绕“掌握”和“公民”主题的建构,作为自我扮演者和国家形态的自主参与者。然而,“有能力的”公民带来了一定程度的不稳定,使政府不安。早期的政府基于君主制和专制政体提供了一种宝贵的稳定力量,因为他们认为由一个单一的,一致的统治将不会产生混乱。但是,甚至连西德尼都承认,虚构的东西是单一的,一致的意志,而拥有一致,平等执行的法律的国家可以在很大程度上抵制不稳定。西德尼的作品激发了一种关于自我的观念,该观念允许将主体重新定义为自己的主权。他的著作剖析了自我建构的工作,它显示了弥尔顿所需要的,霍布斯所担心的通往公民主体的道路。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gilmore, Christine Cecelia.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 224 p.
  • 总页数 224
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号