首页> 外文学位 >The pastoral of the American way in the technological society: Liberalism in transition, 1922-1939.
【24h】

The pastoral of the American way in the technological society: Liberalism in transition, 1922-1939.

机译:科技社会中美国方式的牧民:过渡中的自由主义,1922-1939年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study reassesses the American literary pastoralism that is the subject of Leo Marx's The Machine in the Garden and disagrees with Marx about the nature and function of recurrent portrayals of the conflict between the "machine" and the "garden." The Pastoral of the American Way began as a method of dramatizing the political and social theory of the eighteenth-century liberalism that informs the primary political documents of American society. Far from being a static body of beliefs and attitudes, this liberalism has inherent philosophical and political tensions, a condition that insures both dissent and assent within the same ideological framework as well as conceptual differences over time. This liberalism derives from Locke's social contract theory and is what many have named the "American Way." Locke's state of nature setting encouraged the development of a pastoralism that dramatizes the American Way. Following Clifford Geertz and Victor Turner, the Pastoral of the American Way is a dynamic ideological system of myths and symbols that makes an autonomous politics possible and which serves as a ritual process. The Pastoral of the American Way functions as what Kenneth Burke calls a "terministic screen" that selects and deflects "reality." Drawing on the work of Sacvan Bercovitch, this study argues that the Pastoral of the American Way functions as a jeremiad transformed for a secular, Lockean society.; The Pastoral of the American Way plays a vital and constructive role in evaluating and transforming American liberalism in the years between the First and Second World Wars. During this period, the imagery of the Pastoral of the American Way is explicitly associated with the label of American liberalism, and both are used to signal the "true" meaning of America. Sinclair Lewis's Babbitt, Louis Bromfield's The Farm, and John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath use pastoral practices to comment on the status of American liberalism, and parallel the writings of such public intellectuals and figures as Herbert Croly, John Dewey, Walter Lippmann, Henry Adams, and Frederick Winslow Taylor.
机译:这项研究重新评估了利奥·马克思(Leo Marx)的《花园里的机器》(The Machine in the Garden)中的美国文学田园主义,并且对马克思对“机器”与“花园”之间冲突的反复刻画的性质和功能持不同意见。 《美国人之道》以一种戏剧化的方法开始,该方法戏剧化了18世纪自由主义的政治和社会理论,为美国社会的主要政治文献提供了信息。这种自由主义远非一成不变的信念和态度体系,它具有固有的哲学和政治张力,这种条件可确保在同一意识形态框架内既有异议也有不同意见,并能保证随着时间的推移观念上的差异。这种自由主义源于洛克的社会契约论,被许多人称为“美国之道”。洛克的自然环境鼓励了以美国方式为戏剧的牧民主义的发展。继克利福德·吉尔茨(Clifford Geertz)和维克多·特纳(Victor Turner)之后,《美国方式的田园》是一个由神话和符号组成的充满活力的意识形态体系,它使自治政治成为可能,并成为一种仪式过程。美国之道的牧师就像肯尼思·伯克(Kenneth Burke)所称的“确定性屏幕”一样,它选择并偏离了“现实”。根据萨克万·贝科维奇(Sacvan Bercovitch)的工作,这项研究认为,《美国方式的田园》的作用就像是为世俗的洛克式社会转变的耶利米德式改革。在第一次世界大战和第二次世界大战之间的几年中,美国方式的牧民在评估和改变美国的自由主义方面起着至关重要的建设性作用。在此期间,“美国之道”的意象与美国自由主义的标签明确相关,并且两者都用来表示美国的“真实”含义。辛克莱·刘易斯(Sinclair Lewis)的巴比特(Babbitt),路易斯·布罗姆菲尔德(Louis Bromfield)的《农场》(The Farm)和约翰·斯坦贝克(John Steinbeck)的《愤怒的葡萄》(The Grapes of Wrath)使用牧民的手法来评论美国自由主义的地位,并与赫伯特·克鲁利,约翰·杜威,沃尔特·利普曼,亨利·亚当斯等公共知识分子和人物的著作相提并论。以及Frederick Winslow Taylor。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nichols, Michael Dane.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas Christian University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas Christian University.;
  • 学科 American Studies.; Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 305 p.
  • 总页数 305
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 F17;I712;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号