首页> 外文学位 >Exploratory analysis of factors related to the implementation of guidelines governing 'faculty support' for online programs in the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools accreditation region.
【24h】

Exploratory analysis of factors related to the implementation of guidelines governing 'faculty support' for online programs in the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools accreditation region.

机译:探索性分析与实施有关指导“教职人员支持”的指导方针有关的因素的因素,这些指导方针适用于南部高等学校认证协会的在线课程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This associational study was designed to determine if specific distance learning program demographic factors influenced the implementation and application of the 2002 guidelines established by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) on "faculty support" for online programs at 4-year public and 4-year private postsecondary institutions in the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) accreditation region. This study looked at one set of hypotheses addressing the relationship between the 2002 guidelines governing faculty support for online faculty and five demographic factors (Age of Distance Education Program, Type of Degrees Offered by the Institution, Number of Students Enrolled in Distance Education Program, Institution Size and Institution Type). The conceptual framework for this study was the CHEA's 2002 guidelines outlining the procedure or action of implementing and evaluating the guidelines governing faculty support.;This study employed a quantitative research design, specifically, a non-experimental Cross Sectional Survey using Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis. Likert-type scale questions were used to ascertain the faculty perspective on how their institution was implementing or applying the 2002 guideline governing "Faculty Support". The alpha (alpha) for this study was .05.;This study's main results indicated that in general the faculty members are "not sure" if their institutions are implementing the 2002 CHEA guidelines governing support for online faculty. There was a statistically significant relationship with one of the five distance learning program demographics and one of the guideline components "after" the adoption of the guidelines. Implications for practice were derived from this study's findings for the CHEA, institutions, and policy-makers. The current study was limited by some factors.;This study reveals that policy guidelines governing faculty support for those teaching online are not being implemented well within institutions, which is both an important finding for institutions and the organizations issuing the guidelines. This study demonstrates that it is imperative to ensure that a policy does not generate an atmosphere of "not sure" when its intent is to ensure quality in distance education.
机译:这项关联研究旨在确定特定的远程学习计划人口统计学因素是否影响了高等教育认证委员会(CHEA)制定的2002年指南的实施和应用,该指南针对4年公众和4年制在线课程的“教职人员支持”南部高校联合会(SACS)认可地区的一年级私立高等教育机构。这项研究研究了一组假设,这些假设解决了2002年指导教师支持在线教师的准则与五个人口统计学因素之间的关系(远程教育计划的年龄,该机构提供的学位类型,远程教育计划的在校生人数,该机构规模和机构类型)。这项研究的概念框架是CHEA的2002年指南,概述了实施和评估指导教师支持的指南的程序或行动;该研究采用了定量研究设计,特别是使用多元回归/相关分析的非实验性横断面调查。 。使用李克特式量表问题来确定教师对其机构如何实施或应用2002年指导“教师支持”的指导方针的看法。该研究的alpha(alpha)为0.05。该研究的主要结果表明,总的来说,教师“不确定”他们的机构是否正在实施2002年版的CHEA指导方针,以支持对在线教师的支持。与五个远程学习计划人口统计数据之一和“采用”准则后的准则组成部分之一有统计显着关系。实践的含义来自于本研究对CHEA,机构和政策制定者的发现。当前的研究受到某些因素的限制。该研究表明,在学院内部,管理教职人员对在线教学的支持的政策指南并未得到很好的实施,这对于机构和发布指南的组织都是重要发现。这项研究表明,当政策旨在确保远程教育的质量时,必须确保政策不会产生“不确定”的气氛。

著录项

  • 作者

    Barnes, Karen L.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.;Education Administration.;Education Technology of.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 216 p.
  • 总页数 216
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号