首页> 外文学位 >Ontology and genuine moral action: Jnana (intuitive perception), ethics, and karma-yoga in Sankara's 'Advaita Vedanta' and Schopenhauer's 'On the Basis of Morality'.
【24h】

Ontology and genuine moral action: Jnana (intuitive perception), ethics, and karma-yoga in Sankara's 'Advaita Vedanta' and Schopenhauer's 'On the Basis of Morality'.

机译:本体论和真正的道德行为:桑纳(Sankara)的“阿达菲塔·韦丹塔(Advaita Vedanta)”和叔本华的“道德基础”中的詹纳(直觉知觉),道德和业力瑜伽。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Sankara's ethics is based on the belief that there are no unique, and separate selves, but rather that our ontological condition is non-dual (advaita). The problem is twofold. (1) A metaphysic which posits no separate individual is problematic for western ethics, because it is claimed that a non-dual conception of the self leads to the possibility of immoral actions. Western ethical theory requires an individual agent upon which accountability for actions can be placed. (2) Most western interpretations fail to account for Sankara's metaphysical explanation of our ontological basis as non-dual, and hence the understanding of his ethical theory is misguided.; Therefore, I show that an understanding of Sankara's metaphysic is required in order to understand his theory of action. Once western presuppositions of the self are excluded, non-duality is not a problem, because our actions become centered in compassion for the other and not egotistical concern for the self.; This study also provides a western example (via Germany), of an ethic which is similar to Sankara's concept of the self as non-dual. Schopenhauer argues that the basis of morality is in compassion for others. Compassion for others is grounded in Schopenhauer's belief that all humans are not separate. That is, our ontological basis is non-dual. Hence, egoistic action is not moral, because it cannot provide the basis for genuine moral action.; The procedure is historical and critical. Since Sankara is influenced by, and yet significantly transformed, by his predecessors's work, it is necessary to provide historical and philosophical setting for his work. The procedure is critical because nearly all the extant philosophical literature ignores the ethical tenets of his thought. A critical assessment of the literature and an explication of the relevant primary sources provides the necessary reconstruction of the relation between ethics and metaphysics in Sankara's theory of non-duality.; I show that moral action (karma-yoga) accompanied with intuitive perception (jnana-yoga) leads to a realization of our ontological basis as advaita Brahman. Knowing our ontological basis provides the possibility for genuine moral action. Sankara's advaita provides a viable alternative to western ethical theories of action.
机译:Sankara的伦理学基于这样的信念,即没有独特的,独立的自我,而是我们的本体论条件是非对偶的(惯常的)。问题是双重的。 (1)对于西方伦理学来说,没有单独的个体的形而上学是有问题的,因为它声称对自我的非双重观念会导致不道德行为的可能性。西方伦理学理论要求可以对行为负责的个人作为代理。 (2)大多数西方解释未能解释桑卡拉对我们本体论基础的形而上学解释是非对偶的,因此对他的伦理理论的理解是错误的。因此,我表明需要了解Sankara的形而上学才能理解他的行为理论。一旦排除了西方关于自我的前提,非二元性就不成问题,因为我们的行动集中于同情他人,而不是对自我的自负。这项研究还提供了一个西方的例子(通过德国),这种例子类似于桑卡拉关于非对偶自我的概念。叔本华认为道德的基础是对他人的同情。对他人的同情基于叔本华的信念,即所有人类不是分开的。也就是说,我们的本体论基础是非对偶的。因此,利己主义行为不是道德的,因为它不能为真正的道德行为提供基础。该程序是历史性的并且很关键。由于桑卡拉受到其前任作品的影响,但又发生了重大变化,因此有必要为其作品提供历史和哲学背景。该程序至关重要,因为几乎所有现存的哲学文献都忽略了他思想的道德原则。对文献的批判性评估和对相关主要资料的阐述为桑卡拉非对偶性理论中的伦理学与形而上学之间的关系提供了必要的重构。我表明道德行为(业力瑜伽)与直觉感知(jnana-yoga)相伴,使我们认识到本体论基础是婆罗门。了解我们的本体论基础为真正的道德行动提供了可能性。 Sankara的优势为西方伦理行动理论提供了一种可行的选择。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tietge, Katherine Leigh.;

  • 作者单位

    Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.;

  • 授予单位 Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 225 p.
  • 总页数 225
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号