首页> 外文学位 >Renovating the kitchen: Irishness, nationalism, and form in the theatre of John B. Keane, Tom Murphy, Hugh Leonard, Brian Friel, and Thomas Kilroy.
【24h】

Renovating the kitchen: Irishness, nationalism, and form in the theatre of John B. Keane, Tom Murphy, Hugh Leonard, Brian Friel, and Thomas Kilroy.

机译:翻新厨房:约翰·基恩(John B. Keane),汤姆·墨菲(Tom Murphy),休·伦纳德(Hugh Leonard),布莱恩·弗里尔(Brian Friel)和托马斯·基尔罗伊(Thomas Kilroy)的剧院中的爱尔兰式,民族主义和形式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines Irish drama of the period 1959-1993 in light of the radical transformations which took place in Irish culture and society during this time. Taking as its starting point the new policy initiatives undertaken by the Lemass government in the late 1950s, which had the effect of opening Ireland's previously insular economy and culture to foreign influences, it explores how the resulting changes were registered in, and acted as an influence on, the works of playwrights John B. Keane, Tom Murphy, Hugh Leonard, Brian Friel, and Thomas Kilroy. In doing so, it examines how these dramatists have reappraised the concepts of Irishness and nationalism and reinterpreted them, within the context of dramatic form, for the stage.;As background for the discussions which follow, the first chapter of the dissertation surveys the state of Irish culture and society, and of Irish theatre, in the decades leading up to the social and economic revolution of the sixties and seventies. It then considers the impact of the changes as felt not only in economic terms, but also in Irish intellectual, cultural, and artistic life. This introduction is followed by individual chapters devoted to each of the five playwrights. In discussing a selection of representative texts from each dramatist's oeuvre, the dissertation examines the interrelated questions of how each playwright's theatre represents, and is representative of, an Ireland in transition, and how each writer's work conforms to, challenges, or modifies what can be seen as an inherited Irish dramatic tradition. As these chapters suggest, theatre history and social/cultural history are intertwined in the drama of these five playwrights. Each has confronted the dilemma of how to negotiate between past and present in a rapidly changing society. While their responses have been distinct and unique, the dissertation's conclusion suggests that their works are linked by a number of culturally- and socially-influenced connections and commonalities. As a final gesture, the conclusion also briefly considers the works of other contemporary Irish dramatists, particularly younger playwrights who have emerged since 1980, within the context of the achievements of Keane, Murphy, Leonard, Friel, and Kilroy.
机译:这项研究根据这段时期爱尔兰文化和社会发生的根本性变化,考察了1959-1993年间的爱尔兰戏剧。以1950年代后期Lemass政府采取的新政策举措为起点,该举措具有使爱尔兰以前孤立的经济和文化对外国影响开放的作用,它探讨了由此产生的变化如何被记录并发挥影响剧作家约翰·基恩(John B. Keane),汤姆·墨菲(Tom Murphy),休·伦纳德(Hugh Leonard),布莱恩·弗里尔(Brian Friel)和托马斯·基洛伊(Thomas Kilroy)的作品。在这样做的过程中,它考察了这些戏剧家是如何在舞台上重新评估爱尔兰和民族主义的概念,并在舞台上对它们进行了重新诠释的。作为后续讨论的背景,论文的第一章概述了国家。在六十年代和七十年代的社会和经济革命之前的几十年中,爱尔兰文化和社会以及爱尔兰剧院的发展都受到了影响。然后,它考虑了变化的影响,不仅在经济方面,而且也在爱尔兰的知识,文化和艺术生活中感受到。在引言之后,紧接着介绍了五位编剧的每章。在讨论每位戏剧家的作品中的代表性文本时,论文研究了以下相互关联的问题:每位剧作家的剧院如何代表和代表转型中的爱尔兰,以及每位作家的作品如何适应,挑战或修改可能的内容。被视为继承的爱尔兰戏剧传统。正如这些章节所暗示的那样,剧院历史和社会/文化历史在这五位剧作家的戏剧中交织在一起。在迅速变化的社会中,每个人都面临着如何在过去和现在之间进行谈判的困境。尽管他们的回应是独特而独特的,但论文的结论表明,他们的作品是由许多受文化和社会影响的联系和共性联系在一起的。最后的结论是,在基恩(Keane),墨菲(Murphy),伦纳德(Leonard),弗里尔(Friel)和基尔罗伊(Kilroy)的成就的背景下,结论也简要地考虑了其他当代爱尔兰戏剧家的作品,尤其是自1980年以来出现的年轻剧作家的作品。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Alberta (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Alberta (Canada).;
  • 学科 Theater.;Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 162 p.
  • 总页数 162
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 老年病学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号