首页> 外文学位 >A neural network approach for the solution of Traveling Salesman and basic vehicle routing problems.
【24h】

A neural network approach for the solution of Traveling Salesman and basic vehicle routing problems.

机译:一种用于解决旅行推销员和基本车辆路径问题的神经网络方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Easy to explain and difficult to solve, the traveling salesman problem, TSP, is to find the minimum distance Hamiltonian circuit on a network of n cities. The problem cannot be solved in polynomial time, that is, the maximum number of computational steps needed to find the optimum solution grows with n faster than any power of n. Very good combinatoric solution approaches including heuristics with worst case lower bounds, exist.; Neural network approaches for solving TSP have been proposed recently. In the elastic net approach, the algorithm begins from m nodes on a small circle centered on the centroid of the distribution of cities. Each node is represented by the coordinates of the related point in the plane. By successive recalculation of the position of nodes, the ring is gradually deformed, and finally it describes a tour around the cities.; In another approach, the self organizing feature map, SOFM, which is based on Kohonen's idea of winner takes all, fewer than m nodes are updated at each iteration.; In this dissertation I have integrated these two ideas to design a hybrid method with faster convergence to a good solution. On each iteration of the original elastic net method two {dollar}ntimes m{dollar} matrices of connection weights and inter node-city distances must be calculated. In our hybrid method this has been reduced to the calculation of one row and one column of each matrix, thus, If the computational complexity of the elastic net is {dollar}O(ntimes m){dollar} then the complexity of the hybrid method is {dollar}O(n+m).{dollar}; The hybrid method then is used to solve the basic vehicle routing problem, VRP, which is the problem of routing vehicles between customers so that the capacity of each vehicle is not violated. A two phase approach is used. In the first phase clusters of customers that satisfy the capacity constrain are formed by using a SOFM network, then in the second phase the above hybrid algorithm is used to solve the corresponding TSP.; Our improved method is much faster than the elastic net method. Statistical comparison of the TSP tours shows no difference between the two methods. Our computational results for VRP indicate that our heuristic outperforms existing methods by producing a shorter total tour length.
机译:易于解释且难以解决的旅行商问题TSP是在n个城市的网络上找到最小距离哈密顿回路。问题不能在多项式时间内解决,也就是说,找到最佳解所需的最大计算步数以n的增长速度快于n的任何幂次。存在非常好的组合解决方案,包括具有最坏情况下限的启发式方法。最近提出了用于解决TSP的神经网络方法。在弹性网方法中,该算法从以城市分布的质心为中心的小圆圈上的m个节点开始。每个节点由平面中相关点的坐标表示。通过连续重新计算节点的位置,环逐渐变形,最后描述了环游城市的过程。在另一种方法中,基于Kohonen的获胜者思想的自组织特征图SOFM可以在每次迭代中全部更新少于m个节点。在本文中,我综合了这两种思想,设计了一种混合方法,可以更快地收敛到一个好的解决方案。在原始弹性网法的每次迭代中,必须计算连接权重和节点间城市距离的两个{n} n乘以m {dollar}个矩阵。在我们的混合方法中,这已简化为每个矩阵的一行和一列的计算,因此,如果弹性网的计算复杂度为{dollar} O(n×m){dollar},则该混合方法的复杂度是{dollar} O(n + m)。{dollar};然后,使用混合方法解决基本的车辆路线选择问题VRP,这是在客户之间布置车辆的问题,因此不会违反每辆车的容量。使用了两阶段方法。在第一阶段,通过使用SOFM网络形成满足容量约束的客户群,然后在第二阶段,使用上述混合算法求解相应的TSP。我们的改进方法比弹性网方法快得多。 TSP旅行的统计比较显示两种方法之间没有差异。我们对VRP的计算结果表明,我们的启发式算法产生的总游程较短,优于现有方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ghamasaee, Rahman.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Applied Mechanics.; Operations Research.; Engineering Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 212 p.
  • 总页数 212
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 应用力学;运筹学;一般工业技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号