首页> 外文学位 >MODELS OF INSURANCE FRAUD: BUILD-UP, EX POST MORAL HAZARD AND OPTIMAL CONTRACTS (GAME THEORY).
【24h】

MODELS OF INSURANCE FRAUD: BUILD-UP, EX POST MORAL HAZARD AND OPTIMAL CONTRACTS (GAME THEORY).

机译:保险欺诈的模型:建立,事后道德风险和最佳合同(游戏理论)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation studies the problem of insurance fraud using a game theoretic model where a policyholder and an insurer play non-cooperatively. The model is based on the traditional costly state verification framework where the policyholder has private information concerning the state of the world (his loss), and must report it to the insurer. The insurer can learn what the state of the world is by incurring an audit cost. This information asymmetry result in what is called ex post moral hazard. The traditional way to solve this problem is for the insurer to commit to an auditing strategy. This dissertation innovates by removing the insurer's ability to commit. The models in my dissertation are best described as part of the Costly State Verification-Stochastic Auditing-Discrete States-No Commitment literature. I study two types of insurance claim fraud: fraud build-up and auto-theft fraud. In insurance fraud build-up, I assume that the occurrence of an accident is common knowledge. What is known only to the policyholder is the severity of the accident. In auto-theft fraud, I assume that the occurrence of an accident is known to the policyholder only. The possible loss, however, is unique. The optimal contract is such that the policyholder is more than fully insured in the high loss state. In case of auto-theft fraud, this means that the unique possible loss is overcompensated. In the case of build-up, assuming a two-point distribution of losses, the policyholder receives more than the amount he lost if the loss is high. Surprisingly, the penalty inflicted to those who were caught committing fraud has no impact on the optimal contract. Concentrating on the case of build-up, I also find that the policyholder receives the same expected marginal utility in the accident state as in the no-accident state; this is true in the two-point build-up as in the T-point build up cases. This has the interesting policy implication that in order to reduce the amount of insurance fraud in the economy, insurers should be allowed to overcompensate policyholders for their loss.
机译:本文运用博弈论模型研究了保单持有人与保险人非合作博弈的保险欺诈问题。该模型基于传统的成本高昂的状态验证框架,在该框架中,投保人拥有有关世界状况(其损失)的私人信息,并且必须向保险公司报告。保险公司可以通过支付审计费用来了解世界的状况。这种信息不对称导致所谓的事后道德风险。解决此问题的传统方法是让保险公司奉行审计策略。本文通过消除保险人的承诺能力进行创新。我的论文中的模型最好描述为“昂贵的国家验证-随机审计-离散国家-无承诺”文献。我研究了两种保险索赔欺诈:欺诈累积和自动盗窃欺诈。在保险欺诈积累中,我认为事故的发生是常识。仅投保人知道事故的严重程度。在自动盗窃欺诈中,我假设事故的发生仅是保单持有人知道的。但是,可能的损失是唯一的。最佳合同应使投保人在高损失状态下获得充分的保险。在发生自动盗窃欺诈的情况下,这意味着独特的可能损失得到了过度补偿。在积累的情况下,假设损失是两点分配,那么如果损失很高,则保单持有人获得的收益将大于他损失的金额。出人意料的是,对那些被发现犯有欺诈罪的人所施加的惩罚对最佳合同没有影响。着眼于积累的情况,我还发现保单持有人在事故状态下获得的预期边际效用与在非事故状态下相同。在两点堆积中,这与在T点堆积情况中一样。这具有有趣的政策含义,即为了减少经济中的保险欺诈行为,应允许保险人对保单持有人的损失进行超额赔偿。

著录项

  • 作者

    BOYER, M. MARTIN.;

  • 作者单位

    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA.;

  • 授予单位 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA.;
  • 学科 Economics Finance.; Economics General.; Sociology Criminology and Penology.
  • 学位 PH.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 308 p.
  • 总页数 308
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财政、金融;经济学;法学各部门;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号