首页> 外文学位 >In search of great Russia: Elites, ideas, power, the state, and the pre-revolutionary past in the new Russia, 1991-1996
【24h】

In search of great Russia: Elites, ideas, power, the state, and the pre-revolutionary past in the new Russia, 1991-1996

机译:寻找伟大的俄罗斯:1991-1996年新俄罗斯的精英,观念,权力,国家和革命前的过去

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis examines the debate from 1991-1996 among the Russian political elite about Russia's political identity--the nature of Russia's statehood (derzhavnost'), and Russia's role in the geopolitical arena after the collapse of the USSR. Specifically, it analyzes the search for a defining principle--the so-called "Russian Idea"--among the elite, tracing the origins of this concept in Russian history, and discusses the implications of the central component of this idea--that Russia was, is and shall remain a "Great Power." As part of the analysis, the thesis examines elite definitions of Russia as a Great Power, addresses the concept of power itself, assesses the impact of elite definitions of power on the state's internal development and foreign policy, and compares the contemporary definitions, concepts and assessments with those of the pre-Revolutionary elite.;The thesis describes how, from 1991-1996, the Russian political elite methodically sought inspiration from their counterparts in late imperial Russia, who between 1905-1914 had become similarly fixated on the importance of maintaining Russia's geopolitical status in the face of serious domestic and international challenges. The thesis argues that, by 1996, the Russian political elite's almost singular focus on restoring Russia's former "Great Power" glory was based on outdated conceptions of the nature of state power and an unrealistic assessment of Russia's capabilities.;According to all measures of state power, both before the Russian Revolution of 1917, and in the immediate post-Soviet period, Russia was not a "Great Power." Rather, the state's position and influence in world affairs was more the result of its sheer size and general perceptions of its long-term potential, than of its actual economic and political condition or its ability to project power effectively.;The thesis concludes by showing that the Russian elite's obsession with the power and prestige of the Russian state during the immediate post-Soviet period was misguided for another reason: it was completely out of step with the interests of the Russian population which, at that time, were focused on pragmatic concerns of improved living standards and stability.
机译:本文考察了1991年至1996年俄罗斯政治精英之间关于俄罗斯政治身份的辩论-俄罗斯建国的性质以及苏联解体后俄罗斯在地缘政治舞台上的作用。具体来说,它分析了在精英中寻找定义性原理(即所谓的“俄罗斯思想”)的过程,追溯了该概念在俄罗斯历史上的渊源,并讨论了该思想的核心部分的含义。俄罗斯过去,现在和将来将继续是“大国”。作为分析的一部分,本文研究了俄罗斯作为一个大国的精英定义,论述了权力本身的概念,评估了精英定义对国家内部发展和外交政策的影响,并比较了现代定义,概念和论文描述了从1991年至1996年,俄国政治精英如何有条不紊地从后期帝国俄国的同僚那里寻求灵感,他们在1905-1914年间已经同样将注意力集中在维持面对严峻的国内外挑战,俄罗斯的地缘政治地位。论文认为,到1996年,俄罗斯政治精英几乎单一地致力于恢复俄罗斯以前的“大国”荣耀,这是基于对国家权力性质的过时观念以及对俄罗斯能力的不切实际的评估。大国,无论是在1917年俄国革命之前,还是在后苏联时期,俄罗斯都不是“大国”。相反,国家在世界事务中的地位和影响更多是由于其庞大的规模和对其长期潜力的普遍认识,而不是其实际的经济和政治状况或有效地发挥权力的能力。苏联精英在后苏联时期对俄罗斯国家的权力和威望的迷恋是出于另一个原因:这完全与俄罗斯人民的利益不合时宜,当时俄罗斯人的利益集中在务实改善生活水平和稳定性的担忧。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hill, Fiona.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 European history.;Modern history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 490 p.
  • 总页数 490
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号