首页> 外文学位 >A case study approach to the perceptions of Edline(TM), a K--12 technology solution software, at a small Catholic high school in southern Massachusetts.
【24h】

A case study approach to the perceptions of Edline(TM), a K--12 technology solution software, at a small Catholic high school in southern Massachusetts.

机译:在马萨诸塞州南部的一所天主教高中,采用了一种案例研究方法来了解Edline(TM)是一种K--12技术解决方案软件。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Communication technology is perhaps one of the newest trends in education for improving parental involvement. Schools across the world are implementing software programs such as Edline(TM) in order to strengthen the connection between the home and the school. The purpose of this research study was to evaluate the Edline(TM) program through the perceptions of its users: teachers, administrators, parents, and students.;Stufflebeam's CIPP model, Context, Input, Process, Product, was used as a comprehensive framework for conducting formative and summative evaluations of Edline(TM). A mixed-methods case study was embedded in this framework in order to collect data about user perceptions. The single case design of the study included administrator interviews, parent and teacher focus groups, and student questionnaires. The major research question guiding this study is as follows: Based on the perceptions of its users, does Edline(TM) improve parental involvement and the education of the child? The research questions investigated the operational effectiveness of Edine(TM) as a tool for improving parental involvement. Purposive sampling was used by the researcher to conduct n=3 administrator interviews, n=300 hundred student questionnaires, n=3 parent focus groups, and n=3 teacher focus groups.;The research questions investigated user perceptions (teachers, parents, administrators, and students) with respect to Edline(TM)'s effectiveness. These perceptions, in effect, were used to determine whether or not Edline(TM) improved communication between the home and the school. Recurring themes were triangulated from the survey research to assist the researcher in compiling outcomes of the program.;The findings of the research revealed that Edline(TM) improved communication between the home and the school. Perhaps stated more succinctly, Edline(TM) made the dissemination of information such as grades and homework convenient, expedient, and accessible. Whether or not Edline(TM) improves the education of the child is a question that remains indeterminate. A portion of Edline's users feel that the technology is not conducive to developing a culture of independent learners. Another portion of Edline(TM)'s users feel that the technology has provided students with a sense of academic accountability.;While the benefits of online grading systems such as Edline(TM) are endless, there exist many challenges of the Edline(TM) technology that linger in the peripheral. Chief among these challenges are a focused and sustained vision of change, internal commitment and consistency from teacher-to-teacher, and a general cohesiveness in the use and application of the technology among Edline(TM)'s users. In order for Edline(TM) to work more effectively as a system, there needs to be more consistency from teacher-to-teacher and more cohesiveness in the structure and vision of the technology. It can be summarily deduced that Edline(TM) is a great tool that could be an even greater tool with the belief that its novelty and reflection thereof will only lead to its evolution.
机译:通信技术可能是提高父母参与程度的最新教育趋势之一。世界各地的学校都在实施诸如Edline™之类的软件程序,以加强家庭与学校之间的联系。这项研究的目的是通过用户,老师,行政人员,父母和学生的感知来评估Edline(TM)计划。Stufflebeam的CIPP模型,上下文,输入,过程,产品被用作综合框架用于进行Edline™的形成性和总结性评估。在此框架中嵌入了混合方法案例研究,以收集有关用户感知的数据。该研究的单个案例设计包括管理员访谈,家长和老师焦点小组以及学生问卷。指导这项研究的主要研究问题如下:根据使用者的看法,Edline(TM)是否可以改善父母的参与程度和对孩子的教育程度?研究问题调查了Edine(TM)作为改善父母参与程度的工具的操作有效性。研究者使用目的抽样进行了n = 3次管理员访谈,n = 300份学生问卷,n = 3个家长焦点小组和n = 3个老师焦点小组。;研究问题调查了用户的看法(老师,父母,管理者) (和学生)有关Edline(TM)有效性的信息。这些感觉实际上被用来确定Edline TM是否改善了家庭与学校之间的沟通。从调查研究中对重复出现的主题进行了三角剖分,以帮助研究人员编制该计划的结果。研究结果表明Edline(TM)改善了家庭与学校之间的沟通。也许更简洁地说,Edline(TM)使诸如年级和家庭作业之类的信息的传播变得方便,便捷和可访问。 Edline(TM)是否能改善孩子的教育程度仍是一个不确定的问题。 Edline的部分用户认为该技术不利于培养独立学习者的文化。 Edline(TM)用户的另一部分感到该技术为学生提供了一种学术责任感。虽然诸如Edline(TM)这样的在线评分系统的好处是无穷的,但Edline(TM)仍然存在许多挑战)在外围徘徊的技术。这些挑战中的主要挑战是对变革的专注和持续的愿景,教师与教师之间的内部承诺和一致性,以及Edline(TM)用户在技术使用和应用方面的普遍凝聚力。为了使Edline(TM)作为一个系统更有效地工作,需要从教师到老师之间具有更大的一致性,并在技术的结构和视觉上具有更大的凝聚力。可以概括地推论出,Edline TM是一个伟大的工具,可以相信它的新颖性和反思性只会导致其发展,因此可能成为更大的工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kokoszka, Kenneth A.;

  • 作者单位

    Johnson & Wales University.;

  • 授予单位 Johnson & Wales University.;
  • 学科 Education Administration.;Education Technology of.;Education Secondary.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 147 p.
  • 总页数 147
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;中等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号