首页> 外文学位 >'That thy house may be filled': A study of earliest American Methodist lay worship leaders between 1766 and 1773: Philip Embury, Robert Strawbridge, Joseph Pilmore, and Francis Asbury.
【24h】

'That thy house may be filled': A study of earliest American Methodist lay worship leaders between 1766 and 1773: Philip Embury, Robert Strawbridge, Joseph Pilmore, and Francis Asbury.

机译:“那可以填满你的房子”:对1766至1773年间最早的美国卫理公会朝拜领袖的研究:菲利普·埃姆伯里,罗伯特·斯特劳布里奇,约瑟夫·皮尔摩尔和弗朗西斯·阿斯伯里。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Identifying worship concerns in the founding documents of two early nineteenth century seceders from the Methodist Episcopal Church, in New England (1814) and Philadelphia (1801), generated questions about the roots of these issues. A substantial portion of the answer to these questions lay in better understanding how the challenges and choices of America's first Methodists, some forty years earlier, might have affected the development of Methodist worship in America. The present work is limited to an examination of four of American Methodism's earliest worship leaders: Philip Embury, Robert Strawbridge, Joseph Pilmore, and Francis Asbury. It is intended to re-open a discussion of the lives, work, and words of these men in order to analyze their values, attitudes, and practices concerning worship and the sacraments between 1766 and 1773.;A re-examination of available oral history, some contemporaneous letters and documents, plus the published journals of Asbury and Pilmore have formed the basis for the work. What is known of the stories of these four worship leaders has been researched, studied, compared, and contrasted in order to create a historical narrative concerning their experiences during these years. Reviewing and rethinking the work and words of each have suggested revisions to their well accepted portraits which challenge the broad characterizations that have, in some cases, hardened into stereotypes.;These revisions suggest rather, that Embury, not officially sent by John Wesley, was a stronger and more influential leader of the first Methodist congregation in New York City than previously understood. Furthermore, the apparently radical choice of Strawbridge (also an unofficial Methodist representative) to preside at the sacraments may have been rooted in the struggle for sacramental rights among the Irish Methodists of the 1750s. Of Wesley's first official missionaries, Pilmore was a loyal Methodist who was neither on a personal quest for ordination, nor was he anti-itinerancy. Finally, Francis Asbury had a more positive and respectful view of the sacraments than has been previously understood. By suggesting the possibility of altering traditional interpretations, new avenues for conversation about the development of worship among American Methodists may be opened to future historians.
机译:在新英格兰(1814年)和费城(1801年)卫理公会主教堂的两位十九世纪初分离者的开国文件中,人们发现了对崇拜的关注,由此引发了人们对这些问题根源的质疑。这些问题答案的很大一部分在于更好地了解大约40年前的美国第一批卫理公会派教徒的挑战和选择如何影响美国卫理公会派教徒的发展。目前的工作仅限于对美国卫理公会最早的四个朝拜领袖的考察:菲利普·恩伯里,罗伯特·斯特劳布里奇,约瑟夫·皮尔莫尔和弗朗西斯·阿斯伯里。目的是重新讨论这些人的生活,工作和言语,以便分析他们在1766至1773年之间关于礼拜和圣礼的价值观,态度和做法。 ,一些同期的信件和文件,以及阿斯伯里(Asbury)和皮尔莫尔(Pilmore)的已出版期刊,构成了这项工作的基础。对这四位朝拜领袖的故事进行了研究,研究,比较和对比,以形成有关这几年里他们的经历的历史叙述。回顾和重新思考每个人的作品和文字都建议对他们广为接受的肖像进行修订,这些肖像对在某些情况下已经刻板印象的广泛特征提出了挑战;这些修正表明,不是约翰·卫斯理(John Wesley)正式寄出的Embury是是纽约市第一批循道卫理公会的强大领导者,其影响力远超先前的理解。此外,斯特劳布里奇(也是非官方的卫理公会代表)显然是激进的选择主持圣礼,这可能根植于1750年代爱尔兰卫理公会争取圣礼权的斗争中。在卫斯理的首批正式传教士中,皮尔莫尔是一位忠实的卫理公会主义者,他既不亲自寻求戒律,也不反对反独裁。最后,弗朗西斯·阿斯伯里(Francis Asbury)对圣礼的看法比以前理解的更为积极和尊重。通过提出改变传统解释的可能性的建议,美国卫理公会主义者之间关于礼拜发展的讨论的新途径可以向未来的历史学家开放。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号