首页> 外文学位 >Spanning boundaries: An interdisciplinary citation study based on literary studies author co-citation clusters.
【24h】

Spanning boundaries: An interdisciplinary citation study based on literary studies author co-citation clusters.

机译:跨越界限:基于文学研究作者共引文集群的跨学科引文研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This quantitative research study examines the modern academic phenomenon of scholarly communication across disciplinary boundaries. The study uses the discipline of literary studies to empirically demonstrate the influence of one discipline on other disciplines by examining cited references to authors representing literary studies in two citation databases, Arts and Humanities Search (A&HS) and Social SciSearch (SSCI). There are conflicting anecdotal accounts that report literary studies exerts considerable influence on disciplines in the social sciences, and, also, that literary studies had lost its unique identity by annexing the social sciences. This study attempts to scientifically examine these subjective accounts of disciplinary boundary spanning.; A goal of this thesis is to contribute quantitative and empirical techniques to the formal study of scholarly communication. The study proposes that any arts and humanities discipline that is text-based can be described by quantitative techniques, and that descriptive statistics can reveal disciplinary boundary spanning by identifying the disciplines that have been influenced by another discipline.; Literary studies, in this dissertation, is represented by a sample of 88 authors. These authors are grouped into 11 and sometimes 12 schools of thought or author-clusters: constructionists, contextualists, moralists, phenomenologists, rhetoricians, Marxists, philosophers, commentators, African-Americans, feminists, and deconstructionists—core and Freudian. It was found that the core deconstructionists and commentators hold a central position in literary studies, and that no school of thought is isolated from the others.; References to the schools of thought are the criteria used to determine whether and how literary studies influences other disciplines. The years considered are 1980 through 1997. The data indicated: (1) the commentators author-cluster is the most referenced cluster across the databases and this has remained constant over time; (2) the social sciences have been more influenced by literary studies during the years 1989 to 1997 than during the period 1980 to 1989; (3) the disciplines most referencing literary-studies author-clusters are other literary disciplines, and this has remained constant over time; (4) there are similarities in the cited works most referenced by the disciplines in the social sciences and the arts and humanities; (5) Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions is the most cited work by both social scientists and humanists.; The two-step approach used in this thesis will enable scholars to give a holistic response to the question of relations between disciplines.
机译:这项定量研究研究了跨学科界限的学术交流的现代学术现象。该研究使用文学研究学科,通过在两个引文数据库(艺术与人文搜索(A&HS)和社交SciSearch (SSCI)。有一些相互矛盾的轶事记载,报告文学研究对社会科学学科产生了相当大的影响,而且文学研究由于兼并社会科学而失去了其独特的身份。本研究试图科学地检查这些学科界限跨越的主观描述。本文的目的是为学术交流的形式研究贡献定量和经验技术。该研究建议,任何基于文本的艺术和人文学科都可以用定量技术来描述,描述性统计可以通过识别受到另一学科影响的学科来揭示学科的跨度。本文以88位作者为样本,进行文学研究。这些作者分为11个,有时12个思想流派,包括建构论者,情境主义者,道德主义者,现象学家,修辞学家,马克思主义者,哲学家,评论员,非裔美国人,女权主义者和解构主义者,即核心派和弗洛伊德派。人们发现,核心的解构主义者和评论家在文学研究中处于中心地位,并且没有任何思想流派与其他思想流派孤立。对思想流派的引用是用来确定文学研究是否以及如何影响其他学科的标准。考虑的年份是1980年至1997年。数据表明:(1)评论者author-cluster是整个数据库中引用最多的集群,并且随着时间的推移保持不变; (2)相对于1980年至1989年,社会科学在1989年至1997年期间受到文学研究的影响更大; (3)最常引用文学研究作者集群的学科是其他文学学科,并且随着时间的流逝一直保持不变; (4)在所引用的作品中,存在着社会科学,艺术和人文学科所引用最多的相似之处; (5)托马斯·库恩(Thomas Kuhn)的《科学革命的结构》(italic)是社会科学家和人文主义者引用最多的作品;本文采用的两步法将使学者们对学科之间的关系问题做出全面的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号