首页> 外文学位 >Solidarity and political authority during the reign of Zimri-Lim (c. 1775--1762 b.c.).
【24h】

Solidarity and political authority during the reign of Zimri-Lim (c. 1775--1762 b.c.).

机译:Zimri-Lim统治期间的团结和政治权威(约1775--1762 b.c.)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis treats the solidarity and authority of two socio-political groups, tribes and states, in order to sharpen our understanding of the political history of the Amurrite age. It advances the argument that these two groups were distinct by the degree to which each relied upon traditional authority structures in their domestic political organization. Members of tribes appealed to their kin-based mechanical solidarity, whereas others recognized the kin-based composition of tribes as an aggregate of qinnu. At the same time, the distinctive feature of tribes, namely their mechanical solidarity, which facilitated a traditional authority structure, was not without exceptions. The recurrent interactions between tribes and states in the Amurrite age, which are equated with Giddens' 'inter-societal system,' resulted in instances in which the differences between tribes and states were obscured. Thus under Zimri-Lim the Sim'al tribe attempted to directly exercise legal authority as a proxy for the Mariote state at the city of Zalluhan. The Sim'al tribe, however, would prove unsuccessful in its attempt to create organic solidarity as a proxy for the Mariote state.;In foreign politics, both tribes and states used legal means to organize their relationships. Inter-tribal relations were facilitated by hipsu -alliances, whereas states and their sovereigns negotiated the system of international relations. Zimri-Lim's engagement in inter-tribal networks was both his preferred and his most efficient means for conducting foreign politics. By comparison, his interactions with contemporary heads-of-states were marked by inconsistency and unresponsiveness. This difference in Zimri-Lim's exercise of authority among tribes as opposed to states was met with crisis in ZL 9-11. When Elam campaigned into the Habur, they undermined the Sim'al's inter-tribal alliances in the region. At the same time, the Sim'al's alliance with the Yamina, who were dwelling in Mari's districts, grew increasingly uncertain. The repulse of the Elamite threat and the subsequent calming of the Habur was only accomplished with the aid of Hammu-rapi of Babylon, who emerged as an eminent international authority. Thus Zimri-Lim was left without his privileged means for foreign policy in the aftermath of the events of ZL 10-12 and was susceptible to a new, unfavorable political system.
机译:本文旨在探讨两个社会政治团体,部落和国家的团结和权威,以加深我们对阿穆里特时代政治历史的理解。它提出了这样的论点,即这两个群体在各自依赖其国内政治组织的传统权威结构的程度上是不同的。部落成员呼吁他们基于血族的机械团结,而其他成员则认为部落的近亲是部落的总和。同时,部落的显着特征,即他们的机械团结,也促进了传统的权威结构,这一点也不例外。在阿穆里特时代,部落与国家之间的反复互动,等同于吉登斯的“社会间体系”,导致部落与国家之间的差异被掩盖了。因此,在齐姆里·林姆统治下,西玛尔部落试图直接行使法律权力,以替代扎卢罕市马里奥特州。然而,在建立有机团结作为马里奥特州的代理人的尝试中,西马尔部落将证明是不成功的。在国外政治中,部落和国家都使用法律手段来组织其关系。部落间关系得到了hipsu联盟的促进,而国家及其主权者则在谈判国际关系体系。 Zimri-Lim参与部落间网络是他进行外交政治的首选和最有效的手段。相比之下,他与当代国家元首的互动以前后不一致和反应迟钝为特征。 Zimri-Lim在部落之间行使权力而不是在国家之间行使权力的这种差异在ZL 9-11中遇到了危机。当埃兰(Elam)参战哈布尔(Habur)时,他们破坏了Sim'al在该地区的部落间联盟。与此同时,居住在马里(Mari)地区的Yamina与Sim'al的联盟关系变得越来越不确定。抵制Elamite威胁并随后使Habur平静下来,只有在作为著名国际权威的巴比伦的Hammu-rapi的帮助下才能实现。因此,Zimri-Lim在ZL 10-12事件发生后就没有采取特权来执行外交政策,并且容易受到新的不利政治制度的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Miglio, Adam E.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 History Ancient.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 270 p.
  • 总页数 270
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号