首页> 外文学位 >An investigation of the relationship between students' formal level of cognitive development, learning styles, and mathematics achievement in eleventh grade in Abha, Saudi Arabia.
【24h】

An investigation of the relationship between students' formal level of cognitive development, learning styles, and mathematics achievement in eleventh grade in Abha, Saudi Arabia.

机译:沙特阿拉伯Abha的11年级学生的认知发展的正式水平,学习风格和数学成绩之间的关系的调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine male eleventh grade students in Abha district in Saudi Arabia in order to discover their Piagetian cognitive level and to determine whether differences among students exist based on their cognitive levels and their learning styles regarding their achievement in mathematics. Three Piagetian levels of cognitive development: formal (abstract), transitional, and preformal (concrete) were identified. Four learning styles deep, elaborative, fact retention, and methodical study were also used.;Each student was administered three instruments. The Burney Logical Reasoning Test (BLRT) was used to gather data about students' Piagetian cognitive development levels. The Inventory of Learning Processes (ILP) was applied to identify students' learning styles. Aseeri Mathematics Achievement Test (AMAT) was developed by the researcher to measure students' achievement in mathematics. Factorial analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) was the statistical procedure used in this study.;The findings of this study were as follows: (1) There was a significant difference among students in their Piagetian cognitive development levels in grade 11th in Abha district, Saudi Arabia. (2) Only about 21.6% of the total sample were at the formal level, 44.9% were found at the transitional level, and 33.5% of them were at the preformal (concrete) level. (3) There was a significant difference between students' Piagetian cognitive development levels and their achievement in mathematics (p = .00 alpha = .05). (4) Students who were at the formal level (abstract) of cognitive development achieved the highest mean score in their mathematics achievement. (5) Students who were at the preformal level achieved the lowest mean score in their achievement in mathematics. (6) In this study, there was no significant difference between students' learning styles and their achievement in mathematics.;In general, the findings of this study suggest that teachers, textbook authors, and curriculum planners should take into consideration students' cognitive development levels in curriculum design, textbook writing, and teaching approaches. Similar studies related to cognitive development, curriculum design and teaching approaches should be conducted to further identify effective approaches to enhance learning among students at various levels of cognitive development in Saudi Schools.
机译:这项研究的目的是检查沙特阿拉伯艾卜哈地区的11年级男学生,以发现他们的皮亚杰式认知水平,并根据他们的认知水平和他们在数学成绩方面的学习方式,确定学生之间是否存在差异。确定了皮亚吉亚人认知发展的三个级别:正式的(抽象的),过渡的和正式的(具体的)。还使用了四种学习方式:深入,详尽,事实保留和有条理的研究。每个学生被管理了三种工具。 Burney逻辑推理测验(BLRT)用于收集有关学生的皮亚杰认知发展水平的数据。学习过程清单(ILP)用于确定学生的学习方式。研究人员开发了Aseeri数学成绩测验(AMAT),用于测量学生的数学成绩。方差因子分析(双向方差分析)是本研究中使用的统计方法。这项研究的发现如下:(1)学生在阿巴哈(Abha)的11年级的皮亚杰认知发展水平上存在显着差异区,沙特阿拉伯。 (2)正式样本中只有约21.6%处于正式水平,过渡样本中只有44.9%,而前期(混凝土)水平中只有33.5%。 (3)学生的皮亚杰式认知发展水平与他们的数学成绩之间存在显着差异(p = .00 alpha = .05)。 (4)处于认知发展的正式(抽象)水平的学生在数学成绩上获得了最高的平均分数。 (5)处于预备阶段的学生的数学平均成绩最低。 (6)在这项研究中,学生的学习方式与他们在数学上的成就之间没有显着差异;总体而言,这项研究的结果表明教师,教科书作者和课程计划者应考虑学生的认知发展课程设计,教科书撰写和教学方法的各个层次。应该开展与认知发展,课程设计和教学方法有关的类似研究,以进一步确定有效的方法,以增强沙特学校处于认知发展各个层次的学生的学习。

著录项

  • 作者

    Aseeri, Mohammed Muffareh.;

  • 作者单位

    Ohio University.;

  • 授予单位 Ohio University.;
  • 学科 Mathematics education.;Educational psychology.;Developmental psychology.;Cognitive psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 204 p.
  • 总页数 204
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号