首页> 外文学位 >A discourse and rhetorical analysis of technological subjectivities of teachers and students within selected educational technology texts.
【24h】

A discourse and rhetorical analysis of technological subjectivities of teachers and students within selected educational technology texts.

机译:在选定的教育技术文本中对教师和学生的技术主体性进行的话语和修辞分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes public and academic pedagogical and technological discourses of educational technology to identify constructed subjectivities, of teachers and students and the strategies that support these constructions. These concerns lead to the following research questions: (1) that are the predominant subjectivities of students and teachers that are constructed by selected educational technology texts and how do they relate to the discourses in which these subjectivities make sense? (2) How do a selected set of educational technology texts use discourses and rhetoric to support the identified subjectivities? (3) What are some of the implications of these subjectivities for relations of pedagogy and conceptions of teaching and learning that involve technology?;The results of the analysis of the study documents presented in this dissertation show that descriptions of accomplished technology users are related to Sophia's (1998) notion of the technophile as one having an uncritical love of technology. Teachers are described as technophobes who are passive in the face of or who actively resist technological change. Computer technology is prescribed to bypass teachers, a trend historically related to major educational technology interventions in schooling in the past such as instructional television (De Vaney, 1990). The discourses of reform with technology are a form of boosterism that is linked with historical discourses of technology-as-progress.;It is evident in all these documents that the characteristics of being active, being in control, and having expertise are shifting from the teacher to the student resulting in a deskilling of teachers. In these documents a technological subjectivity is now based on a new vocationalism (Kliebard, 1999) in which the purpose of education is to prepare teachers and students for the roles that they will play in the new digital economy. Schools become job-training sites and student assessment is based on the suitability of student 'products' to the needs of business 'clients'.
机译:本文分析了教育技术的公共和学术教学和技术话语,以识别教师和学生的建构主体,以及支持这些建构的策略。这些担忧导致以下研究问题:(1)学生和教师的主要主体性是由选定的教育技术文本构成的,它们与这些主体性有意义的话语有何关系? (2)选定的一组教育技术文本如何使用话语和修辞来支持已确定的主观性? (3)这些主观性对涉及技术的教学法和教与学的关系有什么影响?;本论文研究文件的分析结果表明,对成功的技术用户的描述与索菲亚(Sophia,1998)认为技术爱好者是对技术的非批判性爱。教师被形容为对技术变革持消极态度或积极抵制技术变革的技术恐惧症。规定使用计算机技术绕过教师,这种趋势在历史上与过去的主要教育技术干预(例如教学电视)有关(De Vaney,1990)。用技术进行改革的话语是一种推动主义的形式,与技术作为进步的历史话语相联系。在所有这些文件中,很明显,活跃,可控制和具有专门知识的特征正在从老师对学生的影响,导致老师的负担。在这些文件中,技术主观性现在基于一种新的职业主义(Kliebard,1999),其中教育的目的是使教师和学生为他们将在新的数字经济中扮演的角色做好准备。学校成为工作培训的场所,学生评估是基于学生“产品”对业务“客户”需求的适合性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gance, Stephen Patrick.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Educational technology.;Curriculum development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 208 p.
  • 总页数 208
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号