首页> 外文学位 >Empathy, Enhancement, and Responsibility.
【24h】

Empathy, Enhancement, and Responsibility.

机译:移情,增强和责任感。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation engages with the philosophical, psychological, and scientific literature on two important topics: empathy and human enhancement. My two broad goals are to clarify the role of empathy in ascriptions of responsibility and to consider how enhanced empathy might alter those ascriptions. First, I argue that empathy is best thought of as a two-component process. The first component is what I call the rational component of empathy (RCE). RCE is necessary for moral responsibility as it allows us to put ourselves in another's shoes and to realize that we would want help (or not to be harmed) if we were in the other's place. The second component is what I call the emotive component of empathy (ECE). ECE is usually an automatic response to witnessing others in distress. Expanding on Michael Slote's view that moral distinctions track degrees of empathy, I argue that it is ECE that varies in strength depending on our relationship to specific people.;Second, I argue that in order to achieve Peter Singer's goal an "expanding circle" of care for all human beings, it will be necessary to use some form of artificial empathy enhancement. Within this context, I try to show that empathy enhancement is 1) a reasonably foreseeable possibility within the next decade or so, and 2) morally defensible.;Third, I argue that philosophers who argue that psychopaths are not morally responsible for their actions are mistaken. As I see it, these philosophers have erred in treating empathy as a singular concept and concluding that because psychopaths lack empathy they cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. The distinction between RCE and ECE allows us to say that psychopaths lack one component of empathy, ECE, but are still responsible for their actions because they clearly have a functional RCE.;Fourth, I paint a portrait of the landscape of responsibility with respect to the enhanced empath. I argue that the enhanced empath would be subject to an expanded sphere of special obligations such that acts that were previously supererogatory become, prima facie, morally obligatory.
机译:本文主要涉及两个重要主题的哲学,心理学和科学文献:同理心和人类增强。我的两个主要目标是阐明同理心在责任归属中的作用,并考虑增强同情心如何改变这些归因。首先,我认为同情最好被认为是一个由两个部分组成的过程。第一个要素是我所说的共情的理性要素(RCE)。 RCE对于道德责任而言是必不可少的,因为它使我们能够置身于另一个人的脚下,并意识到如果我们在另一个人的位置上,我们将需要帮助(或不受到伤害)。第二部分是我所说的同情情绪成分(ECE)。 ECE通常是对目睹他人陷入困境的一种自动反应。在迈克尔·斯洛特(Michael Slote)关于道德差异追踪同情程度的观点的基础上,我认为是欧洲经委会的力量在变化,这取决于我们与特定人的关系。第二,我认为,为了实现彼得·辛格的目标,需要建立一个“扩大的圈子”。为了照顾所有人,有必要使用某种形式的人工移情增强功能。在这种情况下,我试图证明同情增强是:1)在未来十年左右的时间内可以合理预见的可能性; 2)在道德上是可以辩护的;第三,我认为认为精神病患者对其行为没有道德责任的哲学家是错误。正如我所看到的,这些哲学家在将同理心视为一个单一概念时犯了错误,并得出结论认为,由于精神病患者缺乏同情心,因此他们不能为自己的行为承担道义上的责任。 RCE和ECE之间的区别使我们可以说,精神病患者缺乏同情心的一个组成部分,即ECE,但由于他们显然具有功能性RCE,因此仍对他们的行为负责。第四,我描绘了关于责任感的肖像。增强的同理心。我认为,同情心的增强将受到特殊义务范围的扩大,从而使原先是过度屈从的行为从表面上看成为道德上的义务。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gurney, David.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Ethics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 275 p.
  • 总页数 275
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号