首页> 外文学位 >Quality of life and the critically ill newborn: Life and death decision making in the neonatal context.
【24h】

Quality of life and the critically ill newborn: Life and death decision making in the neonatal context.

机译:生活质量和重症新生儿:新生儿背景下的生死决策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Therapeutic and technologic innovations in neonatal medicine have made it possible to save many critically ill newborns who would have died in the past. Unfortunately, some newborns saved survive only briefly despite aggressive attempts to keep them alive, while others survive long-term only to live in tragically impaired states. Given this reality, the question no longer is "Can we save this newborn's life?" but "What kind of life are we saving?" This shift in the question manifestly indicates that quality of life has become increasingly important in neonatal decision making.;Notwithstanding its importance, quality of life poses many problems, most notably, it is subject to vast interpretation and immoral application. One reason for this is that there is not one fully developed quality of life position, but many that differ in significant ways. Yet despite the differences, each quality of life position more or less fits into one of three broad approaches, namely: the social quality of life approach centered explicitly on the newborn and familial-societal factors; the individual quality of life approach centered explicitly on the newborn and only implicitly on familial-societal factors; and the relational quality of life approach centered on the relation between the newborn's medical condition and the newborn's ability to pursue life's goals as these are generally understood.;This dissertation reviews representative positions within the three broad quality of life approaches and evaluates the approaches from a moral perspective with the express purpose of determining how quality of life should be defined and applied morally in the neonatal context. The central thesis of this dissertation is that the relational quality of life approach is the most morally plausible in terms of its definition of "quality" of life, viewpoints about the evaluative status of physical life, and considerations about the normative dimensions of quality of life.
机译:新生儿医学的治疗和技术创新使拯救许多过去可能死亡的重症新生儿成为可能。不幸的是,尽管进行了积极的尝试,一些幸存的新生儿只能短暂存活,而另一些则可以长期生存,只能生活在悲剧性受损的州。在这种现实情况下,问题不再是“我们可以挽救这个新生儿的生命吗?”但是“我们要挽救什么样的生活?”问题的这种变化显然表明生活质量在新生儿决策中已变得越来越重要。;尽管它的重要性,但生活质量仍然存在许多问题,最值得注意的是,它受到广泛的解释和不道德的应用。造成这种情况的原因之一是,没有一种生活质量得到充分发展,但许多方面存在重大差异。尽管存在差异,但每种生活质量状况或多或少都适合三种广泛的方法之一,即:社会生活质量方法明确地以新生儿和家庭-社会因素为中心;个人生活质量方法明确地以新生儿为中心,而隐含地以家庭社会因素为中心;生活质量的相关方法集中于新生儿的医疗状况与人们对实现人生目标的能力之间的关系,如通常所理解的。;本论文回顾了三种主要生活质量方法中的代表性立场,并从三个方面评估了这些方法。道德观点,明确的目的是确定在新生儿情况下如何定义和道德地应用生活质量。本文的中心论点是,从生活的“质量”的定义,对身体生活的评价状态的观点以及对生活质量的规范维度的考虑等方面来看,关系生活质量方法在道德上是最合理的。 。

著录项

  • 作者

    Panicola, Michael R.;

  • 作者单位

    Saint Louis University.;

  • 授予单位 Saint Louis University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Health Sciences General.;Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 342 p.
  • 总页数 342
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号